Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Life, the Universe and Everything
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Life, the Universe and Everything Post comments about everything else here.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 08-22-2011, 04:35 PM
apple
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Fallacy: appeal to free speech

Person 1: It's really reprehensible that X says this or that.
Person 2: X has a right to his own opinions.

The problem is that this is a non-sequitur. The person in question did not dispute that X has a right to free speech, he only disapproved of it - which is his free speech right (much to the chagrin of Sarah Palin and others who believe the First Amendment is meant to protect them against criticism). Stating the obvious does not add anything to the debate. So don't.

Conservatives have a habit of doing this when the behavior of the religious lunatics who are in league with them is criticized. It is a neat way to divert attention from the substance of the matter, namely, that they are using their free speech rights to do something that is not respectable. Instead of debating the substance of the matter, the interlocutor of the conservative will be forced to affirm the obvious, and waste valuable time in the process. In the meantime, the substance is completely forgotten, and the conservative's objective is achieved: their loony allies have once again escaped from legitimate and reasonable criticism.
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.