I realize that Michael Kelly
is only the Prince Philip Professor of Technology, Department of Engineering at Cambridge University and has no business weighing in on a subject with a 97% consensus, but nevertheless, the dummy had something to say:
Sir, Andrew Motion (report, Feb 23) is correct to castigate climate change deniers, but he is profoundly mistaken in linking all those who oppose the current climate science orthodoxy into one group. The interpretation of the observational science has been consistently over-egged to produce alarm. All real-world data over the past 20 years has shown the climate models to be exaggerating the likely impacts — if the models cannot account for the near term, why should I trust them in the long term?
Silly, silly man. I guess he hasn't looked in the ocean. That's where the warming is hiding.