Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-27-2011, 11:07 PM
eeeeeeeli eeeeeeeli is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 811
Default Re: Kristin Soltis insinuates that Paul Ryan budget was real

Originally Posted by stephanie View Post
I haven't read Sowell for 15 years and wasn't nearly as impressed with him as badhat (in part for reasons similar to those behind some of the arguments I've had with you, so perhaps you'd like him better). Anyway, here's a good essay that I don't totally agree with on Conflict of Visions .
Thanks for that. A much more fleshed-out theoretical framework than I would have expected. I think he's definitely on to something, but I also find it considerably lacking. It just doesn't seem to offer very much. One side is more individualistic and traditional, the other is more communal, and rational. Yet these barely seem more than limited observation about limited ideological tendencies. And the narrative they paint could almost as often be applied in the reverse. Liberals are often quite independent minded, and uninterested in government intrusion, while conservatives are often quite community oriented, and as such very interested in goverment intrusion. As I said, there are some truths he gets at, by I find his framwork muddled.

Reading his book might shed more light, but I question his authority. I don't get the sense, even as Caplan claims he describes his theory as empirical, that it is based in much empiricism. I wonder whether he has been much of a part of the larger academic discussion on this topic. Although Pinker's mention of him intrigues me. Beyond that, his personal style as a thinker, merely judging from what I have read of his columns, seems utterly hackish and partisan, indulging in tired generalizations and simplistic narratives.

I wonder too how much any of this is merely post-hoc cultural and political description, and whether it even means anything to try and find deeper, more universal psychological tendencies. I certainly don't want to be in the business of trying to reduce complex and nuanced ideological beliefs into simplistic, two dimensional caricatures. However, this is a trap we all can fall into without realizing it, and to rely too heavily on a rational vision of ideology - to the exclusion of psychological tendencies - can lead us into turning into caricatures of ourselves.
my blog
Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.