Originally Posted by miceelf
Weren't you just upset with me for inferring that you were claiming that the liberal version, described by Haidt, was deficient? I am honestly trying to figure out how the above isn't what I inferred you to be saying, or why you were bothered that I thought you were saying the Haidt model showed a deficiency in liberals.
I think we're having a language definition problem. I think you're seeing deficient as a value judgment and I'm seeing deficient as lacking sensitivity to 3 of 5 (or 6) factors relative to conservatives. I've already mentioned that I don't judge other people's sense of morality, didn't I?
I think you (and others) have difficulty with what I'm saying because my thought process and sense of morality is different.