Quote:
Originally Posted by bjkeefe
Leaving aside that you did not actually make any points that I did not address -- and no, merely repeating your assertion that Daniels is "competent" because of poll numbers while refusing to read a voluminous catalog documenting his failings is not a "point" -- you know what is said about people who declare themselves the victor.
|
Extremely high approval ratings and a sweeping reelection in a year that was bad for his party do suggest success, whether you wish to accept it or not. If you have a specific claim you want to discuss, feel free to bring it up. I'm not going to read a voluminous screed against Daniels from a third party.