Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-19-2007, 11:11 AM
kj kj is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 37
Default Re: Iraq By the numbers

See Yglesias for more of what I'm about to say: http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.c..._long_haul.php

This is what the surge all boils down to. Do you want to commit to a minimum 5 year (probably 10-20) commitment of 120,000 troops, another 2-4 trillion dollars, and a few more thousand dead soldiers in order to see "success" in Iraq? The surge has accomplished nothing sustainable and those who argue such are engaging in the wishful thinking that has defined conservative support of this war from the beginning. So you need to make such a commitment if you want to actually accomplish a watered down version of the original goals of this war.

And even if you want to make such a commitment for our armed forces and our taxpayers, do you really think the public will support such an entanglement for another 5, 7, 10 or 20 years? I hope Pi and GarbageCowboy answer this question. And I wish Republicans had to answer it. What is your end game here? What are you selling to the American public? I really want to know what you think is going to happen if we just stay there. And at what point do you go, okay, enough is enough, let's get out. Please answer these questions, I really want to know.
Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.