Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 12-31-2011, 11:57 PM
Simon Willard Simon Willard is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The sylvan exurbs west of Boston Massachusetts.
Posts: 1,328
Default Re: Kudos to Bob for setting the record straight on his hero, Ron Paul

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonderment View Post
Third party candidacies are often debated in terms of who benefits most. Some people argue that Nader was a wash, although many are convinced that Gore would have won without Nader. Some attribute Clinton's 1992 victory to Ross Perot. Then there's George Wallace in 1968. My hunch is that Paul as a third party would hurt Obama, but I'm open to questioning that assumption or following some empirical data that might help clarify it.
First of all, let me affirm your position that Ron Paul brings topics to the table that merit legitimate debate. I am perfectly fine with your a la carte disentangling of Paul's peace issue from his other opinions. It's an issue that should be in the public debate. And I say this as someone who is not really in sync with the peaceniks. I pay no attention to the trolls who want to tar you with Paul's unsavory past.

On the other hand, I feel a Ron Paul third-party run is a danger to the republic. That's because I believe all third-party candidates are a danger to the republic. It's not a comment about Ron Paul, but a flaw in our electoral system. The problem is that third-party candidates tend to split majorities, and it's very important to win with a majority. When the day comes that we have a president elected by 38% of the voters, public cynicism will soar, confidence in government will plummet, and this will be very destabilizing.

I get so depressed when I hear these people on either side of the spectrum talking about the strategy of winning on the back of a spoiler. There's something anti-democratic about it.
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.