Look, whatever this article says is irrelevant. Wilson said he didn't believe Saddam Hussein had a nuclear weapons program before the invasion of Iraq was complete.
And Wilson was right! Saddam didn't have a nuclear weapons program, something we didn't confirm completely until after his New York times op-ed. It would be strange to try to argue that although Wilson was empirically right about nukes in his public arguments, that he was somehow 'really' wrong because of what a senate subcommittee report claims about the intelligence reception (or whatever) of his Niger report.