Originally Posted by handle
Yes, especially convincing when entirely untempered by any degree of threat, or potential consequence of inaction.
But very "logical" i.e. since there was no global nuclear war, the threat was exaggerated! Or DDT for sure would only have prevented malaria from spreading, and the continued (proven) collection of the known toxin in the fat cells of every living thing on the planet (with fat cells that is) would have been inconsequential. Wow.
I haven't followed this thread closely, so, has anyone linked to this article
h/t AR via Dot Earth/NYTimes.