Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25  
Old 02-21-2011, 05:31 PM
Tyrrell McAllister Tyrrell McAllister is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 121
Default Re: Science Saturday: Multiregional Evolution (Razib Khan & Milford Wolpoff)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sapeye View Post
Yes, I understand that, but whether at the population level or the genetic level, it's still natural selection, isn't it?
It's less directly natural selection. Consider a trait T that we have but that Neanderthals don't. If you go back 100,000 years, there were moderns and Neanderthals. The moderns had T, but the Neanderthals didn't. Sometime between then and now, T became universal among all hominids.

Suppose that we killed off all of the Neanderthals. Does that mean that T became universal through natural selection of T? Not necessarily. It was natural selection only if T itself helped us to kill off the Neanderthals. But it's hard to see, e.g. how a lack of an occipital bun would help us to kill them off.

On the other hand, suppose that T helps its host have more children. Then, in each generation, a greater proportion of the population will have T, including the descendants of Neanderthals. The spread of T will then really be a result of natural selection, not just free-riding.
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.