Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #38  
Old 03-30-2010, 08:28 PM
Tyrrell McAllister Tyrrell McAllister is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 121
Default Re: Science Saturday: Who Got What Wrong? (Jerry Fodor & Elliott Sober)

Quote:
Originally Posted by per.christoffersson View Post
Is Fodor of the opinion that a theory is a theory, only if it is able to explain itself without resorting to examples?
I think his point is more that a theory should add something significant to the concrete examples taken from its domain. In particular, the theory should make some nontrivial claim about all examples that could ever arise within its domain.

For example, Newtonian gravitational theory says that all collections of massive particles will exert gravitational forces on each other in accordance with a particular formula that depends only on the positions and masses of those particles and a certain universal constant.

Fodor's fine with a theory making a merely probabilistic claim about all the examples that could arise from its domain. But he doesn't think that Natural Selection Theory meets even this standard.
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.