Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-16-2008, 10:29 AM
Bloggingheads Bloggingheads is offline
BhTV staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default Santa Ana Winds Edition

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-16-2008, 10:56 AM
T.Moran T.Moran is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Mickey Kaus is an idiot and his view points are so juvenile.
Bill Ayers is a non-issue. He is not a terrorist. Mickey should get a life.
Robert Wright is waisting his time with this fool.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-16-2008, 11:09 AM
BeachFrontView BeachFrontView is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 94
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

http://i38.tinypic.com/25fsfuo.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-16-2008, 11:26 AM
BeachFrontView BeachFrontView is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 94
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

I'm tryin to agree with Mickey about the terrorist comments but I just cannot bring myself to agree with him. I agree calling the President to be a Terrorist during the " War on Terror " is the most dispicable thing I have heard. This is one of those times I just cannot see the other side's point of view as legitimate. Republicans are intentionally fanning the flames. It does smell of desperation.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-16-2008, 11:44 AM
themightypuck themightypuck is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 506
Send a message via AIM to themightypuck
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Raymond Chandler for the win.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-16-2008, 11:44 AM
andythornton andythornton is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

I don't think Mickey is an idiot, but I completely agree that the Ayers thing should be a non-issue. As a young (ish) Brit I have to say that I do not know much about the Weather Underground, but it seems from the little I know that there is a massive material difference between Bill Ayers and Osama Bin Laden.

Firstly, Bill Ayers may have used some questionable techniques in his 20s (although, you could argue that we lived in different times back then), but the guy is now the distinguished professor of education at the University of Illinois. Would it be so bad if Obama was genuinely friends with such a person? He is 65 years old professor! Come on ...

Secondly, Palin is clearly doing a sleight of hand. She is putting terrorist and Obama in the same sentence to help reinforce this perceptional about Obama being an Arab / Muslin / Terrorist (which have been conflated in American society since 911 ... at least among certain people). I would have rather Bob and Mickey spent 10 minutes reflecting on that. She is deliberately playing to the deepest fears of still frightened (Middle) America. I suspect she knows better.

Good job though guys ... glad to see you back. Aside from McWhorter/Lowry your diavlogs are a notch above.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-16-2008, 11:55 AM
DoctorMoney DoctorMoney is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 305
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by BeachFrontView View Post
I'm tryin to agree with Mickey about the terrorist comments but I just cannot bring myself to agree with him. I agree calling the President to be a Terrorist during the " War on Terror " is the most dispicable thing I have heard. This is one of those times I just cannot see the other side's point of view as legitimate. Republicans are intentionally fanning the flames. It does smell of desperation.
Ya, I have a hard time understanding what about Obama's Ayers association would actually 'bother' Mickey, as he says. Their grouping isn't particularly tight, there really aren't any quotes from Obama floating around praising BA's record, and as Obama has quickly ascended to political star status he hasn't shown any desire to bring wacky lefties along with him.

Beyond that, it seems pretty clear that they never 'picked' each other as allies in particular. If the board they served on together was, itself, a nasty piece of left-wing cocooning, I could see this argument making traction. But the choice is to join the organization or not -- and Obama didn't select Ayers to do anything.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-16-2008, 12:06 PM
AemJeff AemJeff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,750
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctorMoney View Post
... If the board they served on together was, itself, a nasty piece of left-wing cocooning, I could see this argument making traction. But the choice is to join the organization or not -- and Obama didn't select Ayers to do anything.
Yeah, that darn Walter Annenberg and all those left-wing cocoons he created!

__________________
-A. E. M. Jeff (Eponym)
Magnets - We know how they work!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-16-2008, 12:10 PM
jack d jack d is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

I agree. Mickey is pretty dim. He tries to make up for that by choosing the most contrarian, obnoxious point of view so that he can get attention. I don't even bother to read his stupid comments in Slate. Unfortunately, often to listen to Bob you have to listen to Mickey on this site.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-16-2008, 12:19 PM
Undertoad Undertoad is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Valley Forge Natl Park
Posts: 25
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

More despicable campaigns - via here

1876: Rutherford Hayes vs. Samuel Tilden -- This is the granddaddy of them all: a truly stolen election in which Republicans turned defeat into victory for Rutherford Hayes by counting Democratic votes as their own in three Southern states. Both parties used violence to intimidate former black slaves for their votes. And not to mention that Republicans extorted 2% of the salaries of Federal employees to aid in their campaign efforts, or that Democrats accused Hayes of shooting his mother and robbing the dead, or that Republicans claimed that Samuel Tilden suffered from venereal disease.

1964: Lyndon Johnson vs. Barry Goldwater -- Not as well know as Nixon's 1972 dirty tricks election, Johnson's 1964 win over Goldwater featured the cynical manufacturing of anti-Goldwater stories planted with gullible reporters; children's coloring books portraying Goldwater as a Klansman; CIA invasion of Goldwater's campaign; and FBI bugging of Goldwater's campaign plane.

1800: Thomas Jefferson vs. John Adams -- Way back in only the third election ever held in this country, Thomas Jefferson of the Republicans and John Adams of the Federalists went at it tooth and nail, with Republicans hiring hack writers to attack the incumbent Adams as a "hideous hermaphroditical character." whatever that means, and Federalsts claiming that Jefferson slept with slaves. Thomas Jefferson claimed incumbent John Adams wanted to marry off his son to the daughter of King George III, creating an American dynasty under British rule. Jefferson haters called the challenger a fraud, a coward, a thief, and "a mean-spirited, low-lived fellow, the son of a half-breed Indian squaw, sired by a Virginia mulatto father." The close election was thrown into the House of Representatives, where Jefferson almost certainly made a secret deal to win it all.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-16-2008, 01:02 PM
skonny skonny is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 10
Default Obama's Ayers Answer "Weak"?

Mickey is putting a lot of weight on the word 'associate', and it just won't bear it. Obama's answer would've been weak if he just said "I was 8, forget about it." But contra Mickey, that didn't happen.

He also stressed that what Mickey calls his "association" with Ayers was mostly just serving on the Annenberg Challenge board over a decade ago. As Obama successfully put across, this also contained prominent and respectable men from both parties, including a university president and the president(?) of a conservative newspaper.

How do I know it was successful? Polling seems to indicate it, but I've also got a strong anecdote. My two-time Bush-voting mother, who until tonight had reservations about Obama's extremist associates, called me after the debate to say those had been put to rest, and she has decided to vote for Obama. As goes my Mom, so goes the nation.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-16-2008, 01:08 PM
otto otto is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 129
Default Hullo, Stranger

Good to see Kaus back on the farm.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-16-2008, 01:34 PM
bookofdisquiet bookofdisquiet is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 212
Default Mickey, I still luv ya

Bob has a point, although Mickey is correct to point out that there is a legitimate component to the Ayers based attacks on Obama. Bob's point would be stronger if he argued that the way Palin goes about talking about Ayers is incendiary, not the necessarily the information in the message itself.

Had the McCain campaign brought up the Ayers issue in a respectful, we don't think Obama is a terrorist kind of way--it would have been more effective. McCain could have prefaced the Ayers concerns with statements about understanding Obama served on a board of people advancing charitable purposes and that Ayers was 40 years removed from his awful activities -- but Obama, as President, should understand associations have symbolic meanings -- and Obama's not ready to be President b/c of his failure to understand that his relationships matter.

Instead McCain chose to use the darker message -- instill fear about who Obama really is-- this is why he lost independents. You have to blame Steve Schmidt-- he's a Rove operative schooled in us vs. them politics. Mark McKenna would never have let McCain do what he has done over Ayers because ultimately McKenna is a more moral man who understands the effectiveness of subtlety.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-16-2008, 01:37 PM
Exeus99 Exeus99 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctorMoney
and Obama didn't select Ayers to do anything.
Except host an important early fundraiser for Obama's state Senatorial campaign. Obviously one can make too much of Sen. Obama's association with Ayers, but that's not best rebutted by intentionally making too little of it.
__________________
Chauvinist troll.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-16-2008, 01:53 PM
Ray Ray is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 408
Default Re: Bill Ayers

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidneystones View Post
Bill Ayers and his wife belong in jail, which is exactly where they'd be if his daddy wasn't a rich big-shot in Chicago.
Ha ha ha!

Chicago rules the world! It's a well-known FACT that, to this day, children of Chicago big shots can literally shoot people in the face on busy streets in broad daylight and get away with it! Tough luck, America!

Obaaamaaa! Obaaamaaa!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-16-2008, 02:00 PM
BornAgainDemocrat BornAgainDemocrat is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: near Chattanooga
Posts: 826
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Clinton accused of murder, rape, drug running, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-16-2008, 02:00 PM
Bobby G Bobby G is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 728
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Imagine someone was a racist in the 60s. Imagine further he was a member of a racist organization members of which killed a few African-Americans. Imagine that he personally set off a few bombs that that didn't kill anyone, but damaged property of anti-segregation government officials. Now, finally, imagine this fellow became a distinguished professor of English at the University of Arizona, and refused to disown his past actions, but was proud of them. If he had "palled around" with John McCain four years ago, would you find that relevant to assessing John McCain?

Personally, I'm not sure I would, but I think one should at least go through the thought-experiment before blithely dismissing the Ayers stuff.

Also, a point of clarification: do we know the extent to which Obama "palled around" with Ayers? He'd met the guy, that much I know. And he served on a board with him. But I don't know the extent of their associations beyond that (for example, did Obama launch some campaign in Bill Ayers's living room?).
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-16-2008, 02:04 PM
claymisher claymisher is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newbridge, NJ
Posts: 2,673
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

We're just around the corner from the great liberal triumph. We've got Obama, a guy who's not at all attached to the unsuccessful policies from the 1970s, leading the way. We're going to get real action on health care, energy, Iraq, and the economy.

And here Kaus is, still in the old defensive crouch. What a punk. What a colossal weenie. I don't understand what he does at all. He's like a used-up pencil: he's got no point. It's like he's still mad at Bella Abzug or something.

OK, now I should actually listen to this week's episode.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-16-2008, 02:17 PM
nikkibong nikkibong is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,803
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Bob really nails the McCain/Palin strategy right here:

http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/151...7:12&out=17:19

Tragic, but true.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-16-2008, 02:43 PM
uncle ebeneezer uncle ebeneezer is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,332
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Great diavlog. Bob & Mickey's analysis is SO much more interesting than anything on TV.

I thought the best part of Obama's Ayers response was towards the end when he said something to the effect of "I think the focus on this says more about you (McCain) than it does about me." The Ayers/Acorn stuff is only important to the more fringe elements that are already in the McCain camp anyways. These are the same people that shout out the despicable stuff at McCain rallies.

I can testify to the nature of the Santa Ana winds. They've got me pretty amped up...or then again, maybe it's the election.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-16-2008, 02:57 PM
uncle ebeneezer uncle ebeneezer is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,332
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Isn't "terrorists" plural? Who are the others that Obama pals around with? Anyone who has done anything dangerous recently? I'm not all that surprised that Mickey obsesses on an irelevant issue (that's sortof his MO), especially since he's a Republican.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-16-2008, 03:22 PM
Kandigol Kandigol is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

I'm Obama's age, (actually he is two weeks younger, bless him), and I would like to put the Ayers discussion into some perspective.

Obama was seven or eight years old when Ayers was active as a Weatherman.
The bombing happened 40 years ago, folks. Not to condone the violence, or belittle it, but there is a statue of limitations (no pun intended) in place on even this kind of felony.

In any case, Obama had no part in the Weathermen. At the time, he did not even live in the US, but in Jakarta. He went to school and studied geography and long division. Well, I did back in Hilversum Netherlands at the time, so he must have as well. So stop making him into some kind of accomplice of Ayers actions.
Ayers obviously stopped the bombing and changed careers. He has not been throwing around any bombs anymore for some time. Maybe he repented, maybe not. I don't know.

This is not about Ayers. This should not be about Ayers. He is not running for president.
What was Obama supposed to do? Are you responsible for the past actions, going back thirty, forty years back, of the people you casually work with?
Is this a way to judge someone, who has in his policies and policy statements not shown himself to be that radical at all?
People are calling Obama a socialist. Trust me - I have been around socialists all my life - he ain't a socialist.


Why does this bother Mickey so much? Is this really the worst about Obama people can come up with?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-16-2008, 03:49 PM
DoctorMoney DoctorMoney is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 305
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exeus99 View Post
Except host an important early fundraiser for Obama's state Senatorial campaign. Obviously one can make too much of Sen. Obama's association with Ayers, but that's not best rebutted by intentionally making too little of it.
Right, but people who host fundraisers are a whole tier below 'people you've worked with'. Can you imagine what could be tossed at McCain if every person who has hosted/planned a fundraiser for him were being touted as a professional associate?

It's only making too little of it if McCain is being held to the same standard. Which he very obviously isn't.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-16-2008, 03:51 PM
DoctorMoney DoctorMoney is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 305
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby G View Post
Imagine someone was a racist in the 60s. Imagine further he was a member of a racist organization members of which killed a few African-Americans. Imagine that he personally set off a few bombs that that didn't kill anyone, but damaged property of anti-segregation government officials. Now, finally, imagine this fellow became a distinguished professor of English at the University of Arizona, and refused to disown his past actions, but was proud of them. If he had "palled around" with John McCain four years ago, would you find that relevant to assessing John McCain?
There are a zillion reasons why this analogy doesn't work, most of them having to do with the fact that racism, both radical and otherwise, has been repudiated more than leftism, radical or otherwise.

Your analogy puts an equal sign between them.

Last edited by DoctorMoney; 10-16-2008 at 04:03 PM.. Reason: My spelling, she is bad
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-16-2008, 04:13 PM
Bobby G Bobby G is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 728
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

It's interesting that your problem with my analogy is not that one is less bad than the other, but rather that one has been repudiated more than the other. Personally, I think violently motivated racism is very bad, and I also think that violently motivated extreme leftism that, if effected, would result in a much, much worse society for everyone, is also very bad. I also think the collapse of extreme left-wing regimes all over the world, combined with the suffering they've caused, combined with the fact that most everyone knows this, makes extreme, violent leftism of the sort that Ayers endorsed, as repudiated as vicious racism.

That said, OK, imagine, then, that McCain was not palling around with vicious racists. Imagine instead that he was palling around with John Birchers, or people who opposed the civil rights rights acts of 1964 and 1965, and that furthermore, that these people used violence to do so. Is the analogy any more apt?

And by the way, you've provided only one reason (which I don't think is good) for why the analogy is not apt. You still owe me 1 zillion - 1 reasons.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-16-2008, 04:15 PM
bkjazfan bkjazfan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Los Angeles, Ca.
Posts: 1,192
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Up until running in this election Obama has felt comfortable with the extreme left. It's apparent from the news reports that Ayres wasn't just a neighbor who taught English at a university. Also, the church he had to quit was one I would never have gone to and if I did would have left in 5 minutes. Also, I did find it odd that running for president made him turn his back on the place where he found God. Well, he threw his grandmother under the bus so I guess Reverend Wright was not immune to that treatment. That said he claims to be a man of new associations like Warren Buffet, Paul Volcker, Senator Richard Lugar and General Jim Jones and these are a much higher caliber than the prior ones. So, let bygones be bygones and a new Barack Obama will be ascending to the presidency in short order.

John
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-16-2008, 04:27 PM
Exeus99 Exeus99 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 193
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoctorMoney
Right, but people who host fundraisers are a whole tier below 'people you've worked with'
Right, but, in his case Ayers is both, right?
__________________
Chauvinist troll.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-16-2008, 04:32 PM
Clingon Clingon is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 35
Default Some Imponderables

Adding to the bizarre nature of this election year so far, I believe that the final results are less certain because of these circumstances:

Polling -- Bob mentioned the potential Bradley effect and I guess this election will illustrate if it is valid or not in today's culture but two unusual elements that may upset the applecart one way or another or even cancel each other out are (1) the number of younger voters who do not own land lines and (2) reports that more people than usual are refusing to participate in telephone polls (generally 40-50% but his time more like 80%). Daily Tracking polls currently indicate anywhere between a 4-6% advantage for Obama with anywhere between 5-13% undecided.

Mood -- It's hard to discern whether McCain's combative or Obama's calm demeanor will win the day in the end. If people are in an angry mood they may gravitate towards the "fighter" McCain -- if they need someone to sooth their frayed nerves, Obama will be "The One". Since a lot can happen in the time left, I don't feel that this thing is over although Obama seems to have the advantage but we still could be surprised on election day.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-16-2008, 04:37 PM
AemJeff AemJeff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,750
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exeus99 View Post
Right, but, in his case Ayers is both, right?
You hang onto that thread tenaciously, but I don't think you're doing much justice to your side of the argument. A board such as the one Obama and Ayers served on meets how often? Was it organized (by the Annenbergs!) ideologically, such that membership might imply something about a someone's ideology? It's a thin thread, and parsing every counter-argument to emphasize the lack of no-relationship-at-all isn't illuminating. The fact that this argument has so little traction, except with the those who already seem to be convinced that Obama is a Quisling, ought to seem like evidence that it's not as strong an argument as those making it think it is.
__________________
-A. E. M. Jeff (Eponym)
Magnets - We know how they work!

Last edited by AemJeff; 10-16-2008 at 06:36 PM.. Reason: too <> infinitive
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-16-2008, 04:53 PM
ginger baker ginger baker is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 103
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Mickey has discredited himself...not just for realpolischtick with bob also succumbs to but for partisan bafoonery.

god,how many minutes will this continue?
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10-16-2008, 06:00 PM
fedorovingtonboop fedorovingtonboop is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 216
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

yeah, mickey just kinda play to the middle and it's quite boring. pick a side, mick
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-16-2008, 06:35 PM
ohcomeon ohcomeon is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 279
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

about this board thing - I serve on the board of directors for a major charity. My fellow board members are bank presidents, lawyers, a judge, a head nurse at a major hospital, business owners and - yes - professors.

Since this organization is offically politically neutral it is considered bad manners to even discuss politics in the meetings or at any official event. I do know something about some of their politics as the judge is an elected official and I once worked a campaign event with another member.

However, I know nothing about what any of them were doing 40 years ago and it has never occured to me to ask. Even if I knew they were involved in things I consider objectionable, I would not believe it appropriate to confront them in this setting. We are working for a worthy cause and our focus must remain on that or we could hurt the organization.

When I joined this board I made a committment to serve the mission of the organization. People of different backgrounds and belief systems can work together to for a common worthy cause without necessarily approving of every action individuals members have taken in their lives.

BTW - How can people be more concerned with Ayers than G. Gordon Liddy?
http://mediamatters.org/items/200810040004
__________________
OhComeOnHussein
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-16-2008, 06:47 PM
tarajane tarajane is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 16
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

I think Wright is the one who sounds juvenile in this session -- especially the comment regarding who looks the part of the president and who would you rather look at. Unfortunately, I think a lot of people are drawn to Obama for just these kinds of superficial reasons. They like him for the "part."
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-16-2008, 07:06 PM
AemJeff AemJeff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,750
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

I don't serve, never have served on a board like this. But, this pretty well describes the set of assumptions I have about it.
__________________
-A. E. M. Jeff (Eponym)
Magnets - We know how they work!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-16-2008, 07:08 PM
graz graz is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,162
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by claymisher View Post
It's like he's still mad at Bella Abzug or something.
Yes, because she was obviously hiding something under those hats.

Those Santa Ana winds are truly inspiring Mickey to Nixonian levels of lip sweat, along with exacerbated contrarian shtick. How does the Mickey define palling around? Maybe he could tear himself away from accosting random women on the Venice beach boardwalk and investigate the extent and duration of the Ayers/Obama link?
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-16-2008, 07:15 PM
Joel_Cairo Joel_Cairo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cambridge MA
Posts: 198
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by AemJeff View Post
I don't serve, never have served on a board like this. But, this pretty well describes the set of assumptions I have about it.
Same here. I've never been on any board at all, but I'd surely reject and denounce any one that would have me as a member. The last thing I need is allegations that I've been palling around with someone the likes of me.
__________________
Full Disclosure: I work for BhTV.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-16-2008, 07:24 PM
seyoyo seyoyo is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 33
Default Mickey IS naive

Sometimes I wonder about Mickey....

If Obama's association with Ayers is important because associations matter, isn't John McCain himself now tarred by his association with Obama, having worked with him in the US Senate?

I consider Mickey extremely naive if he really thinks all this Ayers nonsense is anything but something the extreme right can hold on to since Obama has a pretty clean record for a pol.

He has a much cleaner record than Mr. McCain who's been involved with the likes of G. Gordon Liddy- convicted for plotting crimes similar to Ayers', the likes of Ollie North who sold weapons to the same Iranian regime McCain now wants to bomb.

I really mean....WTF? Associations with unsavory characters is the very nature of politics. People in public life get associated with all kinds of people. McCain is associated with ACORN, with Rick Warren, with Saudi despots, Colombian terrorists.

That's politics, and guilt by association is nonsensical.

And Mickey thinks it's sensible for a Vice-Presidential Candidate to call the opponent a terrorist or someone who pals with them.

That's outright a call to violence. Especially when she also says Obama being elected will diminish the dignity of the Presidency. That's some deep s--t folks.

I guarantee you that if something happened to Obama at the hand of a right-winger, the social upheaval that will follow will be as serious as the 1960s. Furthermore, if McCain won using these tactics, he will fail even worse than Bush failed. I hope Mickey gets this.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-16-2008, 08:34 PM
DoctorMoney DoctorMoney is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 305
Default Re: Santa Ana Winds Edition

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby G View Post
And by the way, you've provided only one reason (which I don't think is good) for why the analogy is not apt. You still owe me 1 zillion - 1 reasons.
The other 9,999 kabillion have to do with whether the public effectively *wanted* to bring the militant left of the 60s back into the fold. Compare and contrast that with militant racists. Society made a markedly different judgment of the two sets of radicals.

I'm younger than Obama, so this is all ancient history to me. But my sense of it is that the violent left was viewed as a product of an extremely turbulent time -- force met force (campus shootings, protests met by riot police) and political movements turned nasty. No such allowances have been or will ever be given to the militant segregationists. They're history's bogey men.

Of course, this explains why the Ayers attack fails so completely to persuade anyone who isn't already angry about lefty 60s radicalism. It smacks of reopening wounds that we have gone to some lengths to close up. And most of us Xers and younger have a real allergy to even seeing the subject come up again. It's petty an distracting.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-16-2008, 08:51 PM
bramble bramble is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 31
Default Ayers and Kissinger

The unwritten rules of politics clearly states that you can use your opponent's past associations against him. A common counterattack is to minimize the association while accusing your opponent of character defamation.

Therefore, neither McCain nor Obama can be said to have gone over the line with regard to Ayers.

I personally don't think it is such a big deal that Obama had lunch with Ayers. McCain takes advice from Kissinger, and any decent person would have to call him a war criminal.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-16-2008, 08:56 PM
bramble bramble is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 31
Default Re: Ayers and Kissinger

Oh yeah, I'm surprised that nobody has brought up Bob's screeds against Kaus for palling around with Coulter. In fact, I'm surprised Kaus didn't bring it up...but maybe he did, I didn't watch the whole diavlog.
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.