I appreciate the effort Bob put into the site. But I think it can be successful if the libs are challenged more. The Reason magazine input was crap. Esp Matt Welch. Have Steve Sailer or Mark Steyn on against any of the regular libs. The coming financial collapse of America is going to be pretty bad for people. But it will definitely get great ratings as the play by play is analyzed. Mish Shedlock would be very interesting to listen to in the BHTV format.
The science saturday stuff was full of libs. Boring, uninteresting. As uninteresting as scientific american and NY science times. What a disgrace when the libs refused to appear because of Michael Behe. All Behe did was explain his science exceedingly well. Libs don't like it when you do that. Jerry Pournelle would be great. http://jerrypournelle.com/
All the journolist people who appreared on the site. Interesting to hear sometimes, but again, their POV was unchallenged. Richard Epstein would be great: http://blog.ronhebron.com/2011/11/ri...portunity.html
The UN reports stuff was good, but too reverential to that institution. All the corruption and cynicism at the UN. You have to report on it and challenge it.