Originally Posted by badhatharry
But it wasn't until I listened to Mark Levin that I learned that none of the things which were written in the NYTimes article about the Rolling Stones article (weird! news about news!) were directly attributed to McChrystal. It was all hearsay by his staff. I looked up the article
and sure enough....
FWIW, Slate's coverage also mentioned that. That was either in the piece by Fred Kaplan (who I think is a center-right type character whose main interest is the military) or John Dickerson (who's center-left but makes a somewhat harder effort than most reporters to actually report one or more right-wing perspectives)
edit: It was Dickerson
, ""the fact that McChrystal himself does not seem to have said anything insubordinate may be the deciding factor in how the president treats him now". I guess that's not technically a right-wing position, though it is my impression that the right tends to be more sympathetic to military men.