Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2009, 01:12 PM
Bloggingheads Bloggingheads is offline
BhTV staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default Brushes with Greatness

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2009, 02:35 PM
Joel_Cairo Joel_Cairo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cambridge MA
Posts: 198
Default Re: Brushes with Greatness


http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/179...1:39&out=01:52
__________________
Full Disclosure: I work for BhTV.

Last edited by Joel_Cairo; 02-26-2009 at 02:56 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-26-2009, 03:02 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default "And What Do You Think Of, Bob?"

Fine, but why did your voice go up three octaves?
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-26-2009, 03:06 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Another Question

Just how old is Mickey, anyway?
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2009, 03:10 PM
claymisher claymisher is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newbridge, NJ
Posts: 2,673
Default Re: "And What Do You Think Of, Bob?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjkeefe View Post
'cos that's what soul singers do.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-26-2009, 03:26 PM
Rich Rich is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28
Default The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

So, Bob admits - rightly - that excellent, expensive, high-tech healthcare is going to have to either be rationed or otherwise severely limited. Why oh why would anyone or any company make some high-tech super-duper cure-all machine when it knows from the outset that it will never recoup its costs? This is the flaw of universal coverage. I applaud Bob's admission of that fact, but it doesn't precisely fill me with confidence in the forthcoming control over my health by HHS.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-26-2009, 03:33 PM
AemJeff AemJeff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,750
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
...Why oh why would anyone or any company make some high-tech super-duper cure-all machine when it knows from the outset that it will never recoup its costs? This is the flaw of universal coverage. ...
This is an assertion begging for support. It's refuted by the facts in plenty of countries with universal health care. Health care is always rationed somehow, btw - regardless of the economic model used to support its funding. Maybe rationing based on accidents of circumstance isn't the best model.
__________________
-A. E. M. Jeff (Eponym)
Magnets - We know how they work!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-26-2009, 03:34 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: "And What Do You Think Of, Bob?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by claymisher View Post
'cos that's what soul singers do.
Awesome answer.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-26-2009, 03:38 PM
Rich Rich is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Isn't the least unfair method of rationing the use of the market? In other words, if we rely on government to decide who benefits - i.e. rationing - there's nothing but the potential for abuse. Preventing people who can afford high-end healthcare from getting it in order to be fair to those who cannot doesn't actually help anyone.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-26-2009, 03:54 PM
Francoamerican
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Every western European country has better health care than the United States. People live longer and they generally enjoy better health throughout their lives in Europe---while paying considerably less for their doctors and medicines. The World Health Organisation rates the health care systems of every country in Western Europe as superior to that of the United States. "Socialized" medicine clearly has its advantages...

"Superduper" treatments and machines are wonderful at prolonging life when life is hardly worth living. Perhaps Americans should think less about having a well-engineered death and more about living well.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:03 PM
claymisher claymisher is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newbridge, NJ
Posts: 2,673
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Isn't the least unfair method of rationing the use of the market? In other words, if we rely on government to decide who benefits - i.e. rationing - there's nothing but the potential for abuse. Preventing people who can afford high-end healthcare from getting it in order to be fair to those who cannot doesn't actually help anyone.
That's not the way it works. Every country except Canada still has private medicine. You can spend as much as you want. No one will stop you.

There's also still a free market for medical technology. If you can deliver a cheaper MRI machine, or a machine better than an MRI, hospitals will buy it. Same with gloves, computers, gurneys, etc.

There are hundreds of reason why the analytic tools you learn in econ 101 don't apply to health care. That's more of a problem for econ 101 than anything else.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:05 PM
Rich Rich is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Francoamerican View Post
Perhaps Americans should think less about having a well-engineered death and more about living well.
I'm certain that Americans are welcome to start thinking just that way. Ought they be forced to think that way by their government? I'm not sure that's a future that is all that bright, really.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:07 PM
Rich Rich is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by claymisher View Post
Every country except Canada still has private medicine. You can spend as much as you want. No one will stop you.
Well, in that case, why worry? We probably won't end up like Canada.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:14 PM
AemJeff AemJeff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,750
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Isn't the least unfair method of rationing the use of the market? In other words, if we rely on government to decide who benefits - i.e. rationing - there's nothing but the potential for abuse.
No, of course not. the least unfair system would be triage, prioritizing by need and then applying applying a cost/benefit analysis. (e.g. If two people need heart surgery, pick the one not in late stage cancer first. [Obviously this is a cartoon just to illustrate the logic; extreme circumstances like this are already decided pretty rationally.]) There would be ugly consequences of such a system, but there are ugly consequences of the present system.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Preventing people who can afford high-end healthcare from getting it in order to be fair to those who cannot doesn't actually help anyone.
That's ridiculous on its face, unless somehow you think that curing a poorer person doesn't constitute a benefit to that person. I'm sure you don't believe that.
__________________
-A. E. M. Jeff (Eponym)
Magnets - We know how they work!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:15 PM
Happy Hominid Happy Hominid is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 147
Default Re: Brushes with Greatness

Mickey - the reason that Obama, unlike Bernanke, didn't give us some glimmer of hope that the recession could be over by the end of the year - is that the recession won't be over by the end of the year. You want to make money? Go bet on the tip I just gave you.

Seriously - is anyone listening to Bernanke anymore? What's next, some old Greenspan quotes?
__________________
It's another day in paradise...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:17 PM
Happy Hominid Happy Hominid is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 147
Default Re: Another Question

Hey! I GOT the reference!
__________________
It's another day in paradise...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:18 PM
AemJeff AemJeff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,750
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
I'm certain that Americans are welcome to start thinking just that way. Ought they be forced to think that way by their government? I'm not sure that's a future that is all that bright, really.
Rich, you're making it up as you go along. Nobody's being forced think in any specific way. Democracies decide on big policy ideas and then they implement them. Sometimes it's the right thing, sometimes it's not. there's nothing special, in that sense, about healthcare.
__________________
-A. E. M. Jeff (Eponym)
Magnets - We know how they work!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:20 PM
themightypuck themightypuck is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 506
Send a message via AIM to themightypuck
Default Re: Brushes with Greatness

Listening to Bob talk about the market reacting to this and that drives me nuts. There is an entire industry devoted to this notion that as far as I can tell fares about as well as astrology in actual predictive capacity. As Bob points out later in the diavlog correlation does not equal causation. Other than that quibble it was nice to see Bob and Mickey and I even watched Bob @ TED and was quite impressed although he's got some tough competition from Pinker whose excellent talk about violence is in the on deck circle.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:20 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Isn't the least unfair method of rationing the use of the market? In other words, if we rely on government to decide who benefits - i.e. rationing - there's nothing but the potential for abuse. Preventing people who can afford high-end healthcare from getting it in order to be fair to those who cannot doesn't actually help anyone.
Not to pile on or anything, but it seems to me that the goal of health care reform is to ensure that everyone has access to a minimum level of care, and to the degree that costs hamper pursuit of this goal, you adjust by pushing down what you mean by "minimum level." For example, you might want everyone to be able to get one free checkup per year, and maybe you have to scale it back to one free one every two years for everyone except kids and new mothers. (NB: there is nothing meaningful about this example -- it's just made up to illustrate.)

As far as I know, no serious wonk wants to set up a system where we'd have no doctors in private practice; i.e., if you want to pay for more than the national plan offers you, you'll be able to, up to your own ability to pay. I suspect, also, that there will not necessarily be no private insurers under any plan that has a chance of passing, so you'll continue to be able to opt to pay for your own additional coverage this way, too.
__________________
Brendan

Last edited by bjkeefe; 02-26-2009 at 04:50 PM.. Reason: wordsmithing
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:21 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Another Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Hominid View Post
Hey! I GOT the reference!
Yeah, but you're smart.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:25 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Gibbs/Santelli

Bob did a pretty good job of giving context to Robert Gibbs' remarks that made Santelli and Liddy go hysterical, but it's probably worth watching the original video if you haven't seen it already. The non-threat is right at the beginning, and as Bob sort of said, it boils down to this: I don't know what Santelli sees out there, but he's not seeing what we're seeing.

The whole thing is worth watching, especially for the zingers at the end.

Not quite CJ Cregg, but pretty good.
__________________
Brendan

Last edited by bjkeefe; 02-26-2009 at 04:32 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:37 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Brushes with Greatness

Quote:
Originally Posted by themightypuck View Post
Listening to Bob talk about the market reacting to this and that drives me nuts. There is an entire industry devoted to this notion that as far as I can tell fares about as well as astrology in actual predictive capacity. As Bob points out later in the diavlog correlation does not equal causation.
Second that. Anyone purporting to even explain daily fluctuations in the market irritates me. Bob Garfield did an excellent piece about this, a while back. (Audio and transcript at the same link.)

Quote:
... I even watched Bob @ TED and was quite impressed ...
Second that, too. Anyone who hasn't seen it: don't miss it.

I enjoyed the Pinker talk, too. I'd hate to have to pick one over the other, though.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-26-2009, 04:57 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Francoamerican View Post
"Superduper" treatments and machines are wonderful at prolonging life when life is hardly worth living. Perhaps Americans should think less about having a well-engineered death and more about living well.
I agree with this completely. This is going to be a big battle, though. Part of the way to make a national plan affordable, by my guess anyway, will be to set fairly stringent limits on heroic measures aimed at keeping a near-carcass just barely ticking over. One has only to think about the Terri Schiavo fiasco to realize this. I did draw some comfort when I realized the majority view was "just let her go," but it was also clear that there were plenty of people eager to demagogue this (and probably some sincerely believing she should be kept hooked up to the machines, admittedly) and it was painfully clear that the MSM was happy to report this for way too long as a "balanced" story.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-26-2009, 05:20 PM
Happy Hominid Happy Hominid is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 147
Default Re: Another Question

No... I remember it because of my age. But thanks.
__________________
It's another day in paradise...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-26-2009, 05:21 PM
Happy Hominid Happy Hominid is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 147
Default Goldie Hawn

Not "Smother's Brothers", Bob. "Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In". Unless she made some one-time appearance on SB that I don't recall.

Yes, Brendan, I'm showing it again...
__________________
It's another day in paradise...
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-26-2009, 05:25 PM
PaulL PaulL is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 109
Default No one talks of Rationing in Universal heathcare?

Bob should talk to Ezra Klein who claims there will be no rationing.
Quote:
As far as I know, no serious wonk wants to set up a system where we'd have no doctors in private practice
You forgot the Clinton Administration's first try at Universal Healthcare where it was illegal to obtain private treatment.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-26-2009, 05:31 PM
Francoamerican
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

There have been similar cases in Europe too. In Italy for example, quite recently, there was a woman who had been in a coma for many years and was allowed to die after long legal batttles, to the great indignation of the Pope and many fellow Catholics. Such cases reveal a bizarre alliance between religion and medical science, which are both committed, though for different reasons, to preserving life at any cost.

I once read, but I have never been able to verify this, that approximately 90% of what most people (i.e. those who live a normal life span) spend on medical costs over their entire lives is spent in the last six months of their lives. In other words, dying is an expensive business.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-26-2009, 06:13 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: No one talks of Rationing in Universal heathcare?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulL View Post
Bob should talk to Ezra Klein who claims there will be no rationing.

You forgot the Clinton Administration's first try at Universal Healthcare where it was illegal to obtain private treatment.
I don't remember. Whether your claim is true or not, however, I think we can all agree that effort crashed and burned, and lessons have been learned from it.

I hope you're not bringing up proposals from close to two decades ago for any other reason than to remind us of such lessons. Ditto swinging around the word rationing as an all-purpose club. That's not going to help move any discussion forward. Clearly, there are limits to what sort of health care can be provided, no matter who is paying the bills. In that sense, there is always "rationing" going on -- we never have a situation where everyone gets as much as he or she wants. We are for damned sure not getting it with our current health care system.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-26-2009, 06:17 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Francoamerican View Post
There have been similar cases in Europe too. In Italy for example, quite recently, there was a woman who had been in a coma for many years and was allowed to die after long legal batttles, to the great indignation of the Pope and many fellow Catholics. Such cases reveal a bizarre alliance between religion and medical science, which are both committed, though for different reasons, to preserving life at any cost.
Yeah. We should probably think about updating medical ethics. (I'm sure many people are engaged in that effort, actually.)

Quote:
I once read, but I have never been able to verify this, that approximately 90% of what most people (i.e. those who live a normal life span) spend on medical costs over their entire lives is spent in the last six months of their lives. In other words, dying is an expensive business.
That sounds very familiar, at least as a ballpark figure. I wonder how true it is; e.g., does it include the entire population, so that all those young people who get killed are counted in figuring the average/median? Even if not, and the count is just restricted to people who die a "natural" death, it's still awfully problematic, if accurate.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-26-2009, 06:51 PM
Namazu Namazu is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 185
Default Re: Gibbs/Santelli

Bob and Mickey are full of shit on this one. I would love to know the chain of custody of this non-contextual hatchet job--is this standard operating procedure in the left-o-sphere these days? Listening to Liddy (please provide a minute marker next time), Santelli was clearly offering passive, non-specific assent (happens all the time in interviews), and has never (in the numerous times he's on TV every day) expressed any personal animosity towards or fear of Gibbs. Santelli has a viewpoint, to be sure, but is one the smartest and most level-headed of CNBC's talking heads. Unlike Bob, he also understands the bond market. Let's agree: don't call someone a nut until you do your homework, and I won't call you an asshole.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjkeefe View Post
Bob did a pretty good job of giving context to Robert Gibbs' remarks that made Santelli and Liddy go hysterical, but it's probably worth watching the original video if you haven't seen it already. The non-threat is right at the beginning, and as Bob sort of said, it boils down to this: I don't know what Santelli sees out there, but he's not seeing what we're seeing.

The whole thing is worth watching, especially for the zingers at the end.

Not quite CJ Cregg, but pretty good.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 02-26-2009, 07:20 PM
Gravy Gravy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 50
Default Re: Brushes with Greatness

Bob, I believe that the markets may have wanted Geithner as he was associated with the so-called "bad bank" solution. This was never all that realistic (of the market, not Geithner particularly), but I think they wanted to believe that bank capital could be made good without bank debtholders making much a contribution. If debt got through untouched, then the equity money being wagered on certain banks would probably yield big, big gains. I think it is less and less likely that equity will come through and even redeeming the debt at 100% seems likely to be too much for even future generations to be asked to lift. I didn't like the choice of Geithner, but his current caution and seemingly restricted view of what Treasury is really capable of doing are a little bit more appealing. Still, he is definitely a tax cheat. It is laughable to describe what he did as an honest mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-26-2009, 07:22 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Gibbs/Santelli

Quote:
Originally Posted by Namazu View Post
Bob and Mickey are full of shit on this one. I would love to know the chain of custody of this non-contextual hatchet job--is this standard operating procedure in the left-o-sphere these days? Listening to Liddy (please provide a minute marker next time), Santelli was clearly offering passive, non-specific assent (happens all the time in interviews), and has never (in the numerous times he's on TV every day) expressed any personal animosity towards or fear of Gibbs. [...]
Shorter audio clip of the Santelli/Liddy interview here. The "threat" is discussed starting right at the beginning.

Also, here's a followup, in which Santelli is asked about the interview by Matt Lauer. Relevant portion begins around 1:30. When Lauer presses him, he babbles and backs off a little, but he still is, more or less, saying that he was threatened.

Clearly, this guy is trying to milk his time in the spotlight.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-26-2009, 07:36 PM
jr565 jr565 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 54
Default Re: Brushes with Greatness

Bj,
This doesn't sound like like a madman. he's reflecting on being called out by name is out by name by the press secretary. I certainly don't think he was being threatened. Further, it was Liddy that suggested it was threatening. but in any case, in his Lauer interview he doesn't sound like a raving lunatic.He finds it odd to be called out by name by the press secretary. He wasn't adamant about the point, or suggesting that in fact he was threatened and Matt was wrong.

In fact lauer sounds like he's trying to divert the criticism from Santelli about the bailout, onto a tangential issue so as not to confront the actual point.

In other words, Bob, and Matt are engaging in subterfuge and character assassination so as to avoid the real issue.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-26-2009, 07:52 PM
Rich Rich is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 28
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Francoamerican View Post
Such cases reveal a bizarre alliance between religion and medical science, which are both committed, though for different reasons, to preserving life at any cost.
Yes, what could be worse than prolonging life at any cost? Living wills seem to cover this sort of problem already. The reason it becomes a serious issue in a state where healthcare is a state-sponsored right is because everyone is forced to pay for it. Why not just keep the system we have and avoid the problem? The Schaivo case is another fine example of the way our system seemed to actually function: the courts deciding a legal battle over the custody of an adult, in essence. Had everyone kept out of it it would have worked out just as it did. Why must we give the power to the government in the first place? Let's maintain the system we have.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-26-2009, 07:55 PM
cragger cragger is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 632
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Agreeing that none of us who have posted thus far have hard data to quote, a few impressions here -

The cost/age curve for healthcare is likely "bathtub" in shape since small children are also notable consumers of health care for the first few years. I don't know if you have, or have had, or have been around very young children but they get sick a lot, and the smaller they are the less margin you have or are willing to accept for their health risks, in general. The immune system just isn't up to snuff at birth, and most of us aren't programmed to accept suffering by infants well.

The end of life spike in health care costs in part reflects what is likely to be under-utilization of preventative care and health monitoring during most of life. Lots of folks don't see a doctor for years on end until we break something obvious, or get an infection that we finally give in and admit we can't shake on our own. As the medicos point out, there are various things that can be handled better, and persumably or at least possibly cheaper, if caught earlier by more, rather than less, utilization of health care resources on a more regular basis. Cheaper (and certainly better) that is for those individuals who have problems that would be caught earlier. Somebody somewhere probably has an estimate, or sets of conflicting estimates, as to what the overall dollar cost of regularly checking everyone more frequently and thoroughly would be and how it would change the overall cost picture.

It would be interesting to see the cost/age curves for other industrialized societies that have more universal health care, but I would suspect there is and will always be an increase toward the end of life. Sort of goes with the territory, that is where things start to break down. For a lot of people this involves medication for various things, such as helping regulate blood pressure, which allows them to lead fairly normal lives. Its not just people lying in a hospital bed hooked up to machines that will keep them going for a couple of miserable and desperate last weeks.

Regarding the latter, as in the Shaivo case, and your point about ethics, I think ethics and morality evolve in ways noted in one of the Free Will diavlogs. To spare us all my frequent divergent ramblings I'll just suggest that as such they probably always lag the changing conditions that lead to such evolution.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-26-2009, 08:00 PM
AemJeff AemJeff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,750
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
... Let's maintain the system we have.
You obviously have no chronic illnesses and are currently insured.
__________________
-A. E. M. Jeff (Eponym)
Magnets - We know how they work!
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-26-2009, 08:09 PM
cragger cragger is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 632
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Why must we give the power to the government in the first place? Let's maintain the system we have.
A lot of us find this to be a false choice. I don't want a group I have as much contempt for as I do politicians getting into my healthcare decisions. I do however recognize that a system so inefficient that it costs us far more per capita than in other countries we compete with, to get rather poorer health care (averaged across our citizenry) is not one that begs to be left as is.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-26-2009, 08:17 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by cragger View Post
[...]
Good points, especially about the likely high early-in-life costs.

You're probably also right about the likelihood of things being more expensive due to people postponing getting attention (or regular checkups, for that matter). However, I do wonder about this one. When I have worked at places where there was good health coverage, I have always noticed people who go to the doctor for just about everything. I'm talking sniffles and a cough, a twinge in a joint, like that. And why not, from the self-interested perspective?

So while I agree that there are lots of cases where putting things off until they get worse means higher costs, I also think there are lots of cases where once the personal costs are low enough, there can be over-consumption of what is ultimately a shared resource. Worse, when this changes even in the slightest, there tends to be howling, which you know will be a fear card the reactionaries will play in the upcoming war. I remember when one company I worked at tightened up a bit, to try to control costs, and the outcry at the change of five or ten bucks co-pay for a doctor's visit was not to be believed.

I can't believe I'm relating anecdotes in a health care policy discussion. I hate that. Ending now.

But good post by you.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-26-2009, 08:21 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: The Joys of Rationed Healthcare

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Let's maintain the system we have.
I vote no, too. Too many people are uninsured or under-insured, too many people get wiped out by one-time medical events, too many people are trapped at jobs they hate because they have "a preexisting condition," and too many companies are getting crushed by rising costs.

I'm sure there are lots of other specific reasons, but the bottom line is that our system could be a lot better, and is completely broken from the perspective of tens of millions of people.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-26-2009, 08:29 PM
bkjazfan bkjazfan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Los Angeles, Ca.
Posts: 1,192
Default Re: Brushes with Greatness

Goldie Hawn spoke at my daughter's college graduation several years ago and it was boring.

Now, I have a DVD of "Slumdog" but feel it needs to be seen on the wide screen instead of my 21" TV. I hope it comes back to a theatre.

Kate Winslet was awesome in both "The Reader" and "Revolutionary Road". I liked "TR" a lot expecially the second half of the movie. However, "RR" was not nearly as good as the book it's from by Richard Yates.

John
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.