Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 01-24-2008, 01:00 PM
Fellow Traveler Fellow Traveler is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8
Default Re: Reset

Your post is not particularly responsive to mine.

In any case, your proposition is, in fact, objectionable to readers of the book. (How could it not be? It’s loaded with value-presumptive terms (e.g., “commonplace,” “hijack,” etc.), which again leads you into circularity (i.e., presupposing the very thing you’re trying to prove).)

Again, your comments do not take the trouble to untangle the definitional from the existential. Your operative assumption that Goldberg is primarily concerned with lexicography is misguided. He is concerned with the organic links between ideas, thinkers, institutions and movements. These are phenomena anterior to lexicography.

A cumulative (or preponderance) argument is not really amenable to sampling. It’s volume is, in part, its argument. Presumably, a critic who dismisses a particular example of overlap between liberalism and fascism as incidental has in mind a hypothetical threshold beyond which the sheer volume of such instances render further dismissal problematic. (A critic lacking such a threshold is not discoursing in good faith. He is beyond persuading in principle.)
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.