Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 01-07-2012, 07:36 AM
Florian Florian is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,118
Default Re: LOL

Quote:
Originally Posted by sugarkang View Post
More than happy to. The flaw in your reasoning is that you think unfounded accusations are valid. You think that a potentially innocent person who responds with a cliche is circumstantial evidence of guilt by virtue of the fact that the cliche is a cliche. The flaw in your reasoning is the mob mentality you and most people use to convict innocent (not moral) people, like DSK.
Where did I say that unfounded accusations are valid? I said that accusations of racism cannot be proved (or verified) because they refer to thoughts, beliefs and attitudes (of the person being accused). Obviously, if they cannot be proved, they are not valid.

And where did I say that a person who responds with the cliché is guilty "by circumstantial evidence?" I said exactly the opposite: that the person using the cliché may be telling the truth or may not be telling the truth, but that in any case the cliché has a poisoned history.

The person who uses the cliché is not "guilty" of anything, except perhaps insensitivity to usage or stupidity.

Quote:
You implicitly did.
No, I did not. Show me where I implicitly said that: an innocent person will have to suffer the consequences of getting stuck in unlucky situation

All I said was: Life is tough. That means: a person suspected or accused of racism can deny the charge or try to prove that the accuser is wrong (by his actions for example), but no one is obliged to believe him.

I think you are confusing "guilt" and "innocence" in the legal sense (where they refer to actions or crimes) and guilt and innocence in the purely moral sense, where they refer to thoughts/beliefs/attitudes. Racism falls into the latter category. Do I need to repeat this again? Thoughts, beliefs, attitudes are only known to the person who has them, not to an observer. They cannot be proved or disproved.

Last edited by Florian; 01-07-2012 at 07:55 AM..
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.