Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Stupid pointless flame wars
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Stupid pointless flame wars Flame wars from diavlog threads are dumped here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)
All hope abandon, ye who enter in.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2010, 11:04 PM
Don Zeko Don Zeko is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Exiled to South Jersey
Posts: 2,436
Default Re: Bomb Iran? (Flynt Leverett & Reuel Gerecht)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatfur View Post
based on an opinion that was hardly unique at the time.
We're not suggesting that you have no credibility on this issue because you thought Iraq had WMD's in 2002. Lots of people, including myself, did, although we should have at least had more doubts about the issue. The problem is that, 8 years after the fact, you persist in that belief despite evidence to the contrary that's about as conclusive as anything can possibly be in political debate. In 2010, if you go around saying that Saddam really did have WMD's, you're lying, irrational, stupid, or perhaps some unholy combination of the three.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2010, 01:27 PM
Don Zeko Don Zeko is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Exiled to South Jersey
Posts: 2,436
Default Re: Bomb Iran? (Flynt Leverett & Reuel Gerecht)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Zeko View Post
We're not suggesting that you have no credibility on this issue because you thought Iraq had WMD's in 2002. Lots of people, including myself, did, although we should have at least had more doubts about the issue. The problem is that, 8 years after the fact, you persist in that belief despite evidence to the contrary that's about as conclusive as anything can possibly be in political debate. In 2010, if you go around saying that Saddam really did have WMD's, you're lying, irrational, stupid, or perhaps some unholy combination of the three.
Really, Brenda? I've been more sanguine than most about the new comments policy, but I find it hard to support a standard that the above post violates. It's pretty clear that I was addressing the specific claim that Whatfur was making, and I was doing so in a far more substantive way than Whatfur addresses, well, anything. If we're really going to have a set of forum rules in which you aren't allowed to draw any conclusions about specific commenters at all, that's a serious limit on debate that far outweighs the modest increase in front-page civility it might create.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2010, 01:46 PM
Brenda Brenda is offline
BhTV staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 109
Default Re: Bomb Iran? (Flynt Leverett & Reuel Gerecht)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Zeko View Post
In 2010, if you go around saying that Saddam really did have WMD's, you're lying, irrational, stupid, or perhaps some unholy combination of the three.
In this case, I'd say "stupid" is the flamey word. And then Whatfur comes back with "intellectually limited." That's how the spiral starts, often ending up in the toilet. (It's impossible to predict which exchanges will get out of control, which is why we've been trying to nip them early.)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2010, 02:35 PM
handle handle is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,986
Default Re: Bomb Iran? (Flynt Leverett & Reuel Gerecht)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Zeko View Post
We're not suggesting that you have no credibility on this issue because you thought Iraq had WMD's in 2002. Lots of people, including myself, did, although we should have at least had more doubts about the issue. The problem is that, 8 years after the fact, you persist in that belief despite evidence to the contrary that's about as conclusive as anything can possibly be in political debate. In 2010, if you go around saying that Saddam really did have WMD's, you're lying, irrational, stupid, or perhaps some unholy combination of the three.
I vote for option four. really good post, sorry it got moved. It's very hard to respond to whutzizname without crossing into some disputed border zone with uncivilistan, as his narcissistic attitude, and rigid zealotry are, IMHO, uncivil in themselves.
Perhaps at some point in the future, the admins will take into account the accuracy of the statements in question. I think it must be a very difficult position to be in and while I would not profess to be any wiser, were it my site, posters like him, and me, and a few others would have been cast out into cyberspace a long time ago.

Last edited by handle; 08-25-2010 at 03:06 PM.. Reason: better word
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2010, 04:19 PM
popcorn_karate popcorn_karate is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,644
Default Re: Bomb Iran? (Flynt Leverett & Reuel Gerecht)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenda View Post
In this case, I'd say "stupid" is the flamey word. And then Whatfur comes back with "intellectually limited." That's how the spiral starts, often ending up in the toilet. (It's impossible to predict which exchanges will get out of control, which is why we've been trying to nip them early.)
i concur with Zeko. This is the first nannying you've done that i've thought was inappropriate. Your new standard is that nothing anybody does can possibly be described as "stupid"? I did support arbitrary and firm enforcement as a good disincentive for pushing the limits, but I think this is less a useful disincentive and moving into the territory of just weird.

I'm sure making all those judgment calls you can't help but make questionable decisions on occasion, and you generally do a fine job. just consider whether this may not have been an instance of being a touch heavy handed and proceed accordingly.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-25-2010, 04:39 PM
Brenda Brenda is offline
BhTV staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 109
Default Re: Bomb Iran? (Flynt Leverett & Reuel Gerecht)

Quote:
Originally Posted by popcorn_karate View Post
I'm sure making all those judgment calls you can't help but make questionable decisions on occasion
Indubitably.

Quote:
Originally Posted by popcorn_karate View Post
just consider whether this may not have been an instance of being a touch heavy handed and proceed accordingly
Thanks for disagreeing without being disagreeable.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-25-2010, 09:44 PM
Lyle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default the Brenda Doctrine = the Bush Doctrine

Yes, the Brenda Doctrine is no different from the Bush Doctrine. She uses preemptive force just like Bush did. Talking about nipping stuff in the bud... shit, that's neo-conservative talk. Know hope bh.tv commentariat, know hope.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-26-2010, 12:46 PM
popcorn_karate popcorn_karate is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,644
Default Re: the Brenda Doctrine = the Bush Doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
Yes, the Brenda Doctrine is no different from the Bush Doctrine.
well...except that nobody gets killed under the Brenda Doctrine. Oh, and she waits for the comment to be posted BEFORE taking action. um so yeah - you got nothing, lyle.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-26-2010, 12:59 PM
Brenda Brenda is offline
BhTV staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 109
Default Re: the Brenda Doctrine = the Bush Doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by popcorn_karate View Post
nobody gets killed under the Brenda Doctrine
Yet.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-26-2010, 01:03 PM
Don Zeko Don Zeko is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Exiled to South Jersey
Posts: 2,436
Default Re: the Brenda Doctrine = the Bush Doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenda View Post
Yet.
I see you and Bob are considering some, ah, alternative enforcement mechanisms?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-26-2010, 01:11 PM
TwinSwords TwinSwords is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Heartland Conservative
Posts: 4,933
Default Re: the Brenda Doctrine = the Bush Doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brenda View Post
Yet.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-26-2010, 01:58 PM
Whatfur
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: the Brenda Doctrine = the Bush Doctrine

Yep...cannot get much funnier than that.
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.