Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2009, 08:19 PM
Bloggingheads Bloggingheads is offline
BhTV staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default Chatterboxing

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-2009, 09:36 PM
harkin harkin is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,169
Default Re: Chatterboxing

A nice counterpoint from Tim Kane on the Chait delusions:

"So why did Free exchange go after Amity Shlaes? For starters, it was echoing a long and current piece by Jonathan Chait in the New Republic, whose purpose is to paint modern Republicans as little Hoovers. Except for the little things like tax rates and free trade, which he ignores, choosing to selectively make a case about somebody else making a selective case. My theory is that this is part of a larger reckoning.

Chait wants his readers to think the Amity Shlaes is an outlier (and not the smart kind). But Chait -- perhaps because he also has no economics degree -- makes false claims about consensus in the profession, such as "the essential framework constructed by Keynes--that recessions are caused by a failure of demand, and that at the very least government should not respond to an economic slowdown by paring back its largesse--is no longer in dispute." This is just wrong."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-12-2009, 11:34 PM
pampl pampl is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 750
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by harkin View Post
A nice counterpoint from Tim Kane on the Chait delusions:

"So why did Free exchange go after Amity Shlaes? For starters, it was echoing a long and current piece by Jonathan Chait in the New Republic, whose purpose is to paint modern Republicans as little Hoovers. Except for the little things like tax rates and free trade, which he ignores, choosing to selectively make a case about somebody else making a selective case. My theory is that this is part of a larger reckoning.
That's not really a nice counterpoint. Chait doesn't actually ignore tax rates, and while Obama's been better on free trade than FDR I don't see how that helps his case much. He's just offering transparent wishful thinking to you neo-Hooverites.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-13-2009, 12:46 AM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by harkin View Post
A nice counterpoint from Tim Kane on the Chait delusions:
Shorter harkin:

I now quote a [added: former] Heritage Foundation employee so insignificant he doesn't even have his own Wikipedia page. Therefore, Jon Chait is deluded.
__________________
Brendan

Last edited by bjkeefe; 03-13-2009 at 12:53 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-13-2009, 11:08 PM
themightypuck themightypuck is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 506
Send a message via AIM to themightypuck
Default Re: Chatterboxing

I'm pretty sure I read something by Rothbard or ilk 10 years ago (probably written 30) that pretty much says what Shlaes says.

Last edited by themightypuck; 03-13-2009 at 11:19 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2009, 10:23 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Great diavlog. Looking forward to reading Tim's series.

[Added] One new (to me) idea that I was fascinated by: the portrayal of the health insurance industry as a dying one, needing propping up by the government to maintain its current state, or an inevitable morphing into a niche industry.
__________________
Brendan

Last edited by bjkeefe; 03-12-2009 at 10:30 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-12-2009, 10:51 PM
uncle ebeneezer uncle ebeneezer is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,332
Default Re: What Mickey Gave the World!

http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/182...1:56&out=02:06
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-12-2009, 10:59 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: What Mickey Gave the World!

Quote:
Originally Posted by uncle ebeneezer View Post
I thought the "blah, blah, blah" sealed the deal.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:42 AM
uncle ebeneezer uncle ebeneezer is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,332
Default Re: What Mickey Gave the World!

Quote:
I thought the "blah, blah, blah" sealed the deal.
That part might have been a direct quote;-)

Bob was definitely "on" in the comedy department, in this diavlog.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:59 AM
Nate Nate is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 195
Default Re: What Mickey Gave the World!

Quote:
Originally Posted by uncle ebeneezer View Post
Bob was definitely "on" in the comedy department, in this diavlog.
This was the best humor moment he had, I thought. Gotta love that dry Bob-humor.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-13-2009, 09:26 AM
Simon Willard Simon Willard is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The sylvan exurbs west of Boston Massachusetts.
Posts: 1,328
Default Re: What Mickey Gave the World!

Quote:
Originally Posted by uncle ebeneezer View Post
Bob was definitely "on" in the comedy department.
I guess he doesn't worry about keeping his day job.

Last edited by Simon Willard; 03-13-2009 at 09:32 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-12-2009, 11:04 PM
brucds brucds is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 940
Default Re: Chatterboxing

For the record, Ralph Ellison lost most of the manuscript he'd been working on for his second novel in a house fire in 1967. He started over, leaving 2000 pages, some of which was edited and published after his death. Given the circumstances, not the world's greatest analogy.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:04 PM
bkjazfan bkjazfan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Los Angeles, Ca.
Posts: 1,192
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Many people are probably like Bob and think Ralph Ellsion wrote more than one book. That novel though "The Invisible Man" would be a hard one to top with another. I haven't checked out "Juneteenth" which was mentioned by the diavlogger. Similarly and I am guessing here some writers have written great first novels and their subsequenty ones were not as good. For example, I think Norman Mailer's "Naked And The Dead" was his first and it was in my opinion a classic. His later ones I am not so sure. Now, in the Modern Library Asscociations top 100 novels in English for the 20th Century Ellison's is #19 and the one I mentioned by Mailer is #51.

John
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-12-2009, 11:12 PM
uncle ebeneezer uncle ebeneezer is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,332
Default Re: Homeland Security Sarcasm Alert Reaches "Orange."

As far as straight-man/dry humor, this is pretty awesome.

http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/182...7:25&out=17:40
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:40 AM
Nate Nate is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 195
Default Stock Market optimism

Bob's stock market rally optimism apparently was not as unfounded as he thought. (3 days of rally as of writing this)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-13-2009, 02:22 AM
MikeDrew MikeDrew is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 110
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Man, everyone is avoiding the Freeman thing. I though for sure Bob would have something to say. Perhaps there is Kaus-Wright throwdown in the mix shortly.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:14 AM
Jyminee Jyminee is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 105
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeDrew View Post
Man, everyone is avoiding the Freeman thing.
"Everyone"? Not everyone on bloggingheads:

Brian Beutler and Conor Clarke spent an entire diavlog on it.

Pinkerton and Corn talked about it.

The Matts Yglesias and Welch talked about it.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-13-2009, 10:09 AM
MikeDrew MikeDrew is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 110
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jyminee View Post
"Everyone"? Not everyone on bloggingheads:

Brian Beutler and Conor Clarke spent an entire diavlog on it.

Pinkerton and Corn talked about it.

The Matts Yglesias and Welch talked about it.
I meant everyone I expected to hear about it from in the broader media. That's changed somewhat since I wrote that, however. Much of what has been said on Bloggingheads about it has been utter tripe, however, with Conor Clarke in particular making a complete fool of himself. (He owned to it nicely, though.) So I'd like to hear Bob on the matter, and Mickey too, if he'd show. It's not looking too good for this week, though.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:19 AM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeDrew View Post
Much of what has been said on Bloggingheads about it [the Freeman issue --bjk] has been utter tripe ...
Yeah, too bad we didn't have on a responsible journalist like Michael Goldfarb.

(via)
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:31 AM
opposable_crumbs opposable_crumbs is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 504
Default Re: Chatterboxing

To be fair this Diavlog seemed to cover issues which Timothy had written about in his blog.

On a side note, if there is another intelligence failure (hopefully not) will the Chas Freeman issue resurface? I suspect not, but footballs can come in funny shapes.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 03-13-2009, 10:15 AM
MikeDrew MikeDrew is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 110
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by opposable_crumbs View Post
To be fair this Diavlog seemed to cover issues which Timothy had written about in his blog.

On a side note, if there is another intelligence failure (hopefully not) will the Chas Freeman issue resurface? I suspect not, but footballs can come in funny shapes.
That's a curious metaphor. Freeman will not resurface. Even I, who am fairly exercised about it at the moment, would think I sounded like a crank if I were still going on about it any time after next week, even. That's why I am going kinda apeshit at the press' inattention this week. But again, they took notice yesterday after it popped, so I guess that's fine. The Post opinion section was quite a spectacle, wasn't it, what with all the columnists on one side and the board on the other. Whatever, another one for the Lobby -- not much news there, really. Certainly nothing to dwell on.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:22 AM
opposable_crumbs opposable_crumbs is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 504
Default No more 9/11

Timothy mentions the arrest of Aafia Siddiqui, along with her handbag full of secrets, in order to furnish one of the arguments of his essay. I'm not exactly sure how robust the charges made against Aafia Siddiqui are.

If Timothy is tempted not to become the Ellison of the Slate long-form essay, he could do worse that looking into her arrest and upcoming trial.

Great, if a little cosy, diavlog by the way.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-13-2009, 05:37 AM
mmacklem mmacklem is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 140
Default Memo to Tim Noah

Regarding your question here, Elizabeth Warren has spoken and written about this extensively, and the short-form is this: the primary problem with underwater mortgages is not the assumption that everyone with such a mortgage will give up and walk away from it, but instead that if someone has an underwater mortgage and _then_ suffers any additional financial setback (loss of job, decrease in hours, increase in health insurance premiums, etc.), then they will be very likely to walk away from the mortgage. This scenario has all sorts of secondary consequences, like decreased consumer spending due to an increased sense of lack of returned value in the equity in the house, which in turn pushes us into this "paradox of thrift" scenario. None of this requires the assumption that everyone affected will actually walk away from their mortgage, just that the loss of confidence leads to a negative feedback loop.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-13-2009, 02:22 PM
popcorn_karate popcorn_karate is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,644
Default Re: Et Tu, Bob?

Come on!!!

how is it that we live in a world where the one president that allows a major terrorist attack on our soil should be honored for "keeping us safe"?

Doublethink is basically the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. (Georgie didn't stop the terrorists, therefore Georgie kept me safe from the terrorists)
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:05 PM
Lyle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Et Tu, Bob?

... cause we weren't attacked after it happened and while we were in open war with them. Not to mention the attack was planned out during the Clinton administration.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-13-2009, 04:56 PM
mumi mumi is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Just a quibble here.
Timothy Noah said "we brought terrorism to Iraq." That is not strictly true. We brought _non-state_ terrorism to Iraq. One of the few things that Bush got right is that Saddam's regime was a terrorist regime. He ruled the country with terror, for a minority population.

I'm not defending the indefensible Iraq War. But a distinction should be made between the international terrorism that was visited upon Iraq post 2003 and the all-too-real state terrorism of Saddam Hussein.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-13-2009, 11:06 PM
themightypuck themightypuck is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 506
Send a message via AIM to themightypuck
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Listening to Bob and friends talking about finance is painful. I love Bob and wish he would talk about the cool stuff he generally writes about.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-13-2009, 11:53 PM
themightypuck themightypuck is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 506
Send a message via AIM to themightypuck
Default Re: Chatterboxing

20 minutes in it gets good. 44 minutes in they are reading entrails. Garrrr.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-14-2009, 12:07 AM
themightypuck themightypuck is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 506
Send a message via AIM to themightypuck
Default Re: Chatterboxing

62 minutes. The rape of epistemology and induction.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-14-2009, 12:54 AM
claymisher claymisher is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newbridge, NJ
Posts: 2,673
Default Re: Chatterboxing

I've been a fan of Tim Noah for ages. For me he really strikes the right balance between good humor and actual insight and reporting. Also, this piece he wrote about editing his wife's book has really stuck with me ("... unchecked by the little daily corrections and surprises of her actuality ...").

He wasn't as entertaining here with Bob as his columns are, but it was his first time, and I'd be happy to have him back again.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 03-14-2009, 12:58 AM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by claymisher View Post
I've been a fan of Tim Noah for ages. For me he really strikes the right balance between good humor and actual insight and reporting. Also, this piece he wrote about editing his wife's book has really stuck with me ("... unchecked by the little daily corrections and surprises of her actuality ...").

He wasn't as entertaining here with Bob as his columns are, but it was his first time, and I'd be happy to have him back again.
I had forgotten about that. Thanks for the reminder. That piece was definitely worth re-reading.

Second the nomination for a return visit.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:00 AM
graz graz is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,162
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Clay,

Here he is in an earlier dv with Rosa Brooks:
http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/13719
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:53 AM
Unit Unit is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Tim Noah should try and read Bastiat's "What's seen and what is not seen"

http://www.econlib.org/library/Bastiat/basEss1.html

(if he hasn't already): when a bureaucrat hires 4 million workers, he hasn't really "created" 4 million jobs. That's what's seen. What's much much harder to quantify is what's not seen, i.e., the opportunities that get destroyed because of the actions of said bureaucrat.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-14-2009, 04:16 PM
claymisher claymisher is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newbridge, NJ
Posts: 2,673
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unit View Post
Tim Noah should try and read Bastiat's "What's seen and what is not seen"

http://www.econlib.org/library/Bastiat/basEss1.html

(if he hasn't already): when a bureaucrat hires 4 million workers, he hasn't really "created" 4 million jobs. That's what's seen. What's much much harder to quantify is what's not seen, i.e., the opportunities that get destroyed because of the actions of said bureaucrat.
That seems like the kind of thing people cite but don't actually read. Did you read it?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-14-2009, 09:00 PM
Unit Unit is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by claymisher View Post
That seems like the kind of thing people cite but don't actually read. Did you read it?
Sure, many times. Both in English and in French. Did you read it? What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-15-2009, 05:34 PM
claymisher claymisher is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newbridge, NJ
Posts: 2,673
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unit View Post
Sure, many times. Both in English and in French. Did you read it? What do you think?
I read a lot of it (to its credit it's written in the style that begs to be skimmed). There's a lot to agree with. He hits the "public spending isn't costless" theme pretty hard. There's the famous broken windows fallacy. I too think public investments in Algerian colonies are wasteful. There's more thing in it to agree with:

Quote:
There is an article in the Constitution which states:
"Society assists and encourages the development of labor.... through the establishment by the state, the departments, and the municipalities, of appropriate public works to employ idle hands."

As a temporary measure in a time of crisis, during a severe winter, this intervention on the part of the taxpayer could have good effects. It acts in the same way as insurance.
Remember what Noah was talking about? In 1933 unemployment was at an all-time high, over 20%. The Civil Works Administration employed four million people during the winter of 1934 (Maybe Roosevelt read Bastiat too). Also remember what Bob Wright said about his dad's parents and half his siblings dying. Their lives not lived should count as the "unseen" too.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-15-2009, 05:55 PM
Unit Unit is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by claymisher View Post
I read a lot of it (to its credit it's written in the style that begs to be skimmed). There's a lot to agree with. He hits the "public spending isn't costless" theme pretty hard. There's the famous broken windows fallacy. I too think public investments in Algerian colonies are wasteful. There's more thing in it to agree with:

" There is an article in the Constitution which states:
"Society assists and encourages the development of labor.... through the establishment by the state, the departments, and the municipalities, of appropriate public works to employ idle hands."
As a temporary measure in a time of crisis, during a severe winter, this intervention on the part of the taxpayer could have good effects. It acts in the same way as insurance. "

Remember what Noah was talking about? In 1933 unemployment was at an all-time high, over 20%. The Civil Works Administration employed four million people during the winter of 1934 (Maybe Roosevelt read Bastiat too). Also remember what Bob Wright said about his dad's parents and half his siblings dying. Their lives not lived should count as the "unseen" too.
You're right. But he also goes on to say that "It adds nothing to the number of jobs nor to total wages, but it takes labor and wages from ordinary times and doles them out, at a loss it is true, in difficult times." So he gets there differently than via the Keynesian argument.

To me it's amazing how modern Bastiat sounds, even though he was writing in the first half of the nineteenth century. My favorite in this chapter is the section on "the middleman". Russ Roberts discusses this passage in quite a bit of detail in this Econtalk episode:

http://www.econtalk.org/archives/200..._on_middl.html
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-14-2009, 08:13 PM
petty boozswha petty boozswha is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 14
Default Re: Chatterboxing

I'm surprised you mentioned the 1993 WTC attack - most on the left have shoved that incident down the memory hole due to the inconvenient part about Iraq giving refuge to the bail jumpers.

Also, it would have been helpful if you elaborated [in your WPA Four Million Jobs artical] on the origin of the word "boondoggle" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boondoggle_(project) and how, after a few months of enthusiasm, WPA was said to stand for We Poke Around.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-14-2009, 08:21 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa家h
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Quote:
Originally Posted by petty boozswha View Post
I'm surprised you mentioned the 1993 WTC attack - most on the left have shoved that incident down the memory hole due to the inconvenient part about Iraq giving refuge to the bail jumpers.
I'm surprised you mentioned the 1993 WTC attack - most on the right have shoved that incident down the memory hole due to the inconvenient part about a Democratic administration being in power while the perpetrators were caught, tried in a court of law, and sent to jail, all in accordance with the Constitution, and without torture or secret prisons.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-15-2009, 05:59 PM
Markos Markos is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 334
Default Re: Chatterboxing

Doesn't Murdoch's purchase of the Journal reduce its credibility to a level comparable to that of Fox News?
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.