Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-20-2009, 10:46 PM
SamInMpls SamInMpls is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Default Re: One Man's Meat (Robert Wright & Christopher Hitchens)

While I am quite sympathetic to Hitchens' argument, I find here as in other debates that he's quite uncharitable in his interpretations of the points made by opponent. He seems quite willing to misconstrue the context of Wright's arguments.

Please correct me if I'm wrong but throughout both diavlogs Christopher seemed completely unwilling to grant the premise that the very institution that he has argued "poisons everything" would be more likely to call for reprisals against a group that they deem an enemy of their faith. This seems to be undercutting his own arguments. By not granting that premise he seems to be contradicting his own assertion that religions in some places have been brought under a greater degree of secular control than others. He did grant that he'd be less comfortable seeing a group of men coming out of a prayer meeting in Beirut, Belfast, and Baghdad than he would in, say, Berkley. Shouldn't it then follow that in a place where religion is not constricted by secularism it has a greater capacity to call for violent reprisals against those it deems the enemy?

Again, please point out any errors I've made here.
Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.