Originally Posted by handle
I bet he will avoid mentioning the fact that most of the administrators (who are also public employees and often make double or triple the teacher salaries) do not belong to the unions, and do not teach. Who is going to test and evaluate them? Since they are the ones doing the evaluating, and hiring/firing, what checks and balances besides union representation are in place to prevent abuse, favoritism, nepotism, and general corruption?
all the absolute worst people i've dealt with in education have been administrators. handing more power to the least competent element of the education system doesn't seem likely to improve things very much. They usually got to where they are by having no ability to teach, and so were promoted to the level of their incompetence.