Originally Posted by Richard from Amherst
Frankly I believe that the real argument here is the conflict between a strict interpretation of the constitution and citizenship and the liberal interpretation
of governance that places all power in the hands of government bureaucracy and infantilizes the individual. This is why it is necessary for some of you to stoop to make your nasty little ad hominem comments rather than address the constitutional issue.
You clearly had no interest in discussing the constitutional issues. You've done a victory dance, asserted without support the correctness of your point of view, bragged about your weapons and finally walked back a little when called on your tone by TwinSwords. You were openly invited to discuss the constitutional issues, but chose a completely different tack. You really ought not complain about how you've been treated in this conversation.