Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201  
Old 11-16-2011, 05:11 PM
Wonderment Wonderment is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,694
Default Re: Will Israel Attack Iran? (Elliot Jager & Larry Derfner)

All you are basically saying (I hope) is that the judicial systems in the Arab countries are corrupt and that the society needs reform and democratization. I have lived in a couple of extremely corrupt countries (nominal democracies), so I know something about the difficulty of reform. The court systems, however, have little to do with how a country is likely to behave internationally.
I don't buy in to the whole Arab honor-shame-revenge theory. Those are features of all societies where the rule of law is limited and damaged. Americans and Europeans would revert in a heartbeat to more primitive settlement of dispute if courts were to deteriorate in the West as well. Low literacy socoeties are especially vulnerable, since recourse to the system is limited to those with some basic capacity to understand and use it. In other words, to the extent that such problems exist , education, prosperity and democratization are the answers.

I was with a couple of red-blooded Americans the other day who were sayimg that when Coach Sandusky was caught raping the child, the catcher should have cut his balls off. Probably most Americans wish that he were sent to prison to be raped by other men there. These sentiments have nothing to do with being Arab or Jewish or Christian.
__________________
Seek Peace and Pursue it
בקש שלום ורדפהו
Busca la paz y síguela
--Psalm 34:15
Reply With Quote
  #202  
Old 11-16-2011, 06:42 PM
Ray in Seattle Ray in Seattle is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW Washington
Posts: 441
Default Re: Will Israel Attack Iran? (Elliot Jager & Larry Derfner)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonderment View Post
I don't buy in to the whole Arab honor-shame-revenge theory. Those are features of all societies where the rule of law is limited and damaged.
If you believe your second sentence why would you not buy into it for Arabs as you state in the first? Do you deny that rule of law is not just limited and damaged in Arab societies but is virtually non-existent (as we understand rule of law) in most cases?

Note that I did not blame Arabs for this. I'd say that order is maintained in Arab societies by the honor/shame understanding of Arabs about what is expected of them and what they can expect of others according to those rules. I'm sure everyone prefers that to anarchy. BTW honor/shame rules exist in the USA in small communities that have separated themselves from the majority society. Like the Mafia and inner-city gangs.

Quote:
, education, prosperity and democratization are the answers.
Yes, but hasn't that been a main goal of American foreign policy for the last several decades? And isn't that what many lib/progs call "oppression of brown foreigners"? You know, "forcing" other cultures to accept our values?

You might take exception with our methods. In our defense I'd say that we've tried everything from using our CIA to overthrow regimes that deny education, prosperity and democratization to their citizens - to sponsoring armies in exile (Cuba) - to ignoring them if they are more moderate than their cohorts and hope they see the light - to occupying some states and taking out the war-lords and militants that force their illiberal rules on their population. We've done AID and the Peace Corp and dozens of other programs paid for with taxpayer money - because we all would like to see people in other third world countries enjoy the fruits of freedom and rule of law.

I'd also admit that our priorities favor countries that have crucial natural resources where our well-being is impacted negatively if they are held back by repressive regimes from modernizing. But we give aid and send the Peace Core volunteers to many places where that's not the case.

Granted it's not all altruism - we'd prefer not to spend billions of tax dollars fighting bad guys that attack us that end up killing civilians in far away places. It's terrible for everyone concerned. But a lot of it is altruism. American don't like to see people suffer from lack of education, prosperity and democratization and so we spend lots of our tax dollars to help them if we can. Do you have some better suggestion for helping them get education, prosperity and democratization into their societies?
__________________
Self determination for DNA

Last edited by Ray in Seattle; 11-16-2011 at 08:39 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #203  
Old 11-16-2011, 07:36 PM
Wonderment Wonderment is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,694
Default Re: Will Israel Attack Iran? (Elliot Jager & Larry Derfner)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray in Seattle View Post
If you believe your second sentence why would you not buy into it for Arabs as you state in the first? Do you deny that rule of law is not just limited and damaged in Arab societies but is virtually non-existent (as we understand rule of law) in most cases?
Yes, definitely deny that the rule of law is non-existent in Arab countries, but I don't want to debate the extent to which each country has a functioning and reliable judiciary (I suspect neither of us is an expert in that area).

Quote:
Yes, but hasn't that been the goal of American foreign policy for the last several decades? And isn't that what many lib/progs call "oppression of brown foreigners"? You know, "forcing" other cultures to accept our values?
I have never heard anyone use the phrase "oppression of brown foreigners," and I'm sure most lib/progs subscribe to the notion that democracy, human rights and peace are universal values, and that supporting human rights in places like Israel and Saudi Arabia does NOT constitute "forcing other cultures to accept our values."

Quote:
But a lot of it is altruism. American don't like to see people suffer from lack of education, prosperity and democratization and so we spend lots of our tax dollars to help them if we can. Do you have some better suggestion for helping them get education, prosperity and democratization into their societies?
No, I support non-military foreign aid.
__________________
Seek Peace and Pursue it
בקש שלום ורדפהו
Busca la paz y síguela
--Psalm 34:15
Reply With Quote
  #204  
Old 11-16-2011, 08:37 PM
Ray in Seattle Ray in Seattle is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW Washington
Posts: 441
Default Re: Will Israel Attack Iran? (Elliot Jager & Larry Derfner)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonderment View Post
Yes, definitely deny that the rule of law is non-existent in Arab countries, but I don't want to debate the extent to which each country has a functioning and reliable judiciary (I suspect neither of us is an expert in that area).
That's certainly true in my case. I did find this interesting article. It's not long but touches on many aspects of Civil Society in the Arab world including rule of law. It was written by the Arab senior partner in a law firm in Amman Jordan.

Link to article.
__________________
Self determination for DNA
Reply With Quote
  #205  
Old 11-16-2011, 09:21 PM
Ray in Seattle Ray in Seattle is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW Washington
Posts: 441
Default Re: Will Israel Attack Iran? (Elliot Jager & Larry Derfner)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonderment View Post
Yes, definitely deny that the rule of law is non-existent in Arab countries, but I don't want to debate the extent to which each country has a functioning and reliable judiciary (I suspect neither of us is an expert in that area).
Just some interesting things Salzman wrote about. Not making any points. I think these kinds of things would vary with the amount of modernization that is permitted in different regions in the 23 Arab states as some Arab states have modernized more than others. Also, the rural areas are probably less modernized than cities.

The honor/shame system of social rules provides an inherent form of democracy that I did not expect. Arab society is patriarchal, of course. And so men make the decisions and enforce their own family's behavior to conform to the rules.

There are variations in different Arab societies, but when males get together at the family or clan level to discuss how the family should respond to some event, things become very democratic. Every male of age is allowed their say and when a group decision is reached, no-one is required to participate in the approved action if they don't want to. No grand patriarch imposes the groups decision on all members.

I've seen people claim that Arabs are forced to join militias or are forced to wear a suicide belt, etc. From reading Salzman I believe that's very unlikely. OTOH an Arab male who declines to join a family or clan effort to seek revenge for an act of humiliation against one of its members, for example, may find himself shut off from the protection that the family or clan would provide otherwise should someone from another family or clan attack him. I assume this would depend on what other members thought about his reasons for declining.

Another thing I found is that in many cases honor killings are not done by the family if no-one but the family members know about the dishonorable activity. There may be some beatings and other punishments. But the killing is more often the result of one familiy's accusations of dishonorable acts by daughters of another family - such as being with a non-family boy unescorted by a family member, etc. So it is usually the public humiliation by the other family's claims rather than the act itself that requires killing the daughter to preserve the family's honor. I believe that it was also mentioned that such accusations are sometimes unfounded and motivated by attempts to increase one family's status (honor) vs another's.

These things vary across the Arab world of course but this is one reason why Arab women are covered. To make it less likely someone would be able to accuse your daughter of impropriety and make honor killings of one's daughters less necessary to preserve the family honor.
__________________
Self determination for DNA

Last edited by Ray in Seattle; 11-17-2011 at 12:34 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #206  
Old 11-17-2011, 11:15 AM
stephanie stephanie is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,921
Default Re: Two (or three, or seven) can play at that game...

Quote:
Originally Posted by rfrobison View Post
But if, as you argue, military action would be a disaster and sanctions ineffective or counterproductive, that leaves the grin-and-bear-it strategy. I think that would make the world much more dangerous.
Couple things. First, it leaves diplomatic means and other forms of pressure beyond war or broadbased sanctions. For example, in the post I linked, I indicated that limited sanctions (preventing Iran from getting essentials for a nuclear program) are said to have had some effect. I'm skeptical that these are really enforceable and thus that they will work, but I'm not against it, and also not knowledgeable enough about how it works, so defer to those with more knowledge, as I said before.

Second, my problem with your war or sanctions argument is not that I have a pre-existing view that war or general sanctions can never be justified. It's that I think they are extreme actions that ultimately cause harm/death to innocents and can be counterproductive, and thus they have to be justified in a rather rigorous way. What bothers me about your argument -- and it's totally possible I'm misunderstanding it -- is that it seems to come out of frustration, basically "nothing has worked so far, we have to do something more, let's do this!" But you haven't included as part of your argument what you'd have to include to convince me -- a discussion of why I should think that the likelihood of success is higher than the risks.

Now, I'm not saying that would eliminate the moral question -- we'd still have to go through an analysis of whether the threat justifies it, given that we are talking about actions that have costs, in the form of innocent life. But it's the starting point.

What I find most bothersome about the pro war argument as its been presented so far -- although I explain this by my view that so far it's not something that is a serious possibility -- is that it's entirely focused on the badness of what we are trying prevent with absolutely no reasonable discussion of whether the actions that are urged would have any likelihood of achieving the objections, especially as compared with the non-violent meants that they would make impossible.

Quote:
I find the blithe dismissal of the threat such a weapon poses to be, well, blithe.
I don't think the US is unlikely to go to war with Iran or even to engage in general sanctions because of a "blithe dismissal" of the threat.

Quote:
With regard to your question about the goal of punitive actions against Iran, whether economic or military, the idea is to raise the cost of pursuing or possessing nukes beyond their perceived benefits. To my mind, a seriously tightened sanctions regime would have at least a chance of working, provided the stick were offered in tandem with the carrot, say, of better relations with the West. I doubt they'll take it, though. The regime's identity is bound up in opposition to us.
The reason I don't think this is a sufficient response to "what would this achieve" is that it sounds to me more like a desire for punitive action, with the discussion about why that puntive action would work not much of a focus. Indeed, when you suggest that if Iran is really all that rational, wouldn't it work, you don't seem to believe it yourself.

But okay -- I think you can see, based on your own comment, why people are skeptical that the Iran would respond to general sanctions, placing a burden on the Iranian people and penalizing the regime through that, primarily, by backing down. If anything, it is likely to strengthen the mindset of the regime that they must succeed and that they have good reason for their efforts, and I suspect strengthen its legitimacy in the minds of many, as well as diverting focus from criticism of the government to anger at the West, US, and Israel. It's not like we haven't see this before. I think Iran has shown (like the US, actually) that attacks or perceived attacks are likely to strengthen resolution rather than cause it to back down. Now, that's public threats, at least, whether its position is at stake and it can play its its own citizens. I think behind the scenes deals are far more likely.

Quote:
If, on the other hand, the Iranian people put two and two together and hold their leaders responsible for the country's isolation, they might well decide they've had enough. So much the better if they do.
I think getting into a fight with the US/Israel or even the West generally has the opposite of this effect, as noted above. I have some hopes for developments in Iran, but if you want to prevent those, let the US become the rallying cry as much as possible.

Quote:
If they are as rational as the "no war" advocates appear to believe, they may redo their cost-benefit analysis and give up their bombs.
I think there's a huge difference between being rational in the sense of not using nukes that would lead to your own destruction and being rational in the sense of backing down before an attack that can be easily seen as aggression, where one is in a defensive position. And if you think, especially in the light of Iraq, but that wasn't even necessary, that it would be difficult for Iran to see such a war or portray it to its own people as the result of the US/Israel looking for an excuse to attack it, and the need for a continued fight an existential matter, I think you are assuming that Iran would be rational in a way that countries who are attacked almost never are (and that Israel's own argument for the attack seems not to be, in the the public argument is "this would be so awful, such an existential threat, that basically any costs are acceptable to prevent it").

Last edited by stephanie; 11-17-2011 at 11:18 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #207  
Old 11-17-2011, 02:31 PM
thouartgob thouartgob is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 765
Default FINALLY Eli Lake speaks on the subject

http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...c-warfare.html

I was waiting to see what he was going to say on the subject.

Useful stuff even though it's all a game until the shootin' starts.
__________________
Newt Gingrich:“People like me are what stand between us and Auschwitz.”
Reply With Quote
  #208  
Old 11-17-2011, 03:29 PM
Ray in Seattle Ray in Seattle is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW Washington
Posts: 441
Default Re: FINALLY Eli Lake speaks on the subject

Quote:
Originally Posted by thouartgob View Post
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...c-warfare.html

I was waiting to see what he was going to say on the subject.

Useful stuff even though it's all a game until the shootin' starts.
Fascinating.
__________________
Self determination for DNA
Reply With Quote
  #209  
Old 11-17-2011, 05:49 PM
popcorn_karate popcorn_karate is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,644
Default Re: Will Israel Attack Iran? (Elliot Jager & Larry Derfner)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sulla the Dictator View Post
You sit at the razor's edge of three thousand years of struggle. Three thousand years of men questioning the world and themselves. Three thousand years of blood and iron and sacrifice.
Sulla seems to live in one of the many poorly written fantasy sagas I've read. Entertaining stuff to be sure, but not really sources of deep wisdom and life lessons for most people in the reality based community.
__________________
civil disobedience a problem? NO! Our problem is that people are OBEDIENT all over the world, in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war and cruelty. -HZ
Reply With Quote
  #210  
Old 11-21-2011, 07:46 AM
Baz Baz is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 113
Default Re: Will Israel Attack Iran? (Elliot Jager & Larry Derfner)

What in your opinion are the Iranian's doing thats worse than what Israel is doing to the Palestinians?
Reply With Quote
  #211  
Old 11-29-2011, 08:43 PM
thouartgob thouartgob is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 765
Default Re: FINALLY Eli Lake speaks on the subject

Along with the article from my favorite hawk Eli there are 2 from Spencer Ackerman. One a summary of Eli great article and one about what can be done to actually find Iran's nuclear facilities.

If Israel Bombs Iran, It'll Jam, Spoof and Hack First | Danger Room | Wired.com
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011...b-iran-jammer/

Pentagon Scientists Target Iran's Nuclear Mole Men | Danger Room | Wired.com
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010...clear-molemen/

I don't know what Israel has as compared to the US right now ( I don't think Israel could take out Iran's sites alone ) but in a year or 2 I think they just might. After all we are allies
__________________
Newt Gingrich:“People like me are what stand between us and Auschwitz.”
Reply With Quote
  #212  
Old 12-05-2011, 08:14 AM
ledocs ledocs is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: France, Earth
Posts: 1,165
Default Re: Will Israel Attack Iran? (Elliot Jager & Larry Derfner)

Laaaaaary. Laaaaaary. Did you get the knishes, Laaaaary? Did you pick up the kids, Laaaaaary? Did you talk to Richard and Jerry, Laaaaaaary, about the thing, you know, the thing, the device? Did you call the Anti-Defamation League, Laaaaary, about the guy, you know, the guy, the one who makes jokes that aren't so funny? Because we're talking about something serious, here, Laaaaary, it's not a joke.
__________________
ledocs

Last edited by ledocs; 12-05-2011 at 08:17 AM..
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.