Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-27-2010, 04:25 AM
Bloggingheads Bloggingheads is offline
BhTV staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-27-2010, 08:24 AM
breadcrust breadcrust is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 326
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Lynn Paramore, editor at New Deal 2.0 (see above under "Mike Konczal") wrote a piece at HuffPo on April 27th about a commission which discussed the "myths" of US government deficits. Here's one of the experts:

Quote:
The truth is, the system was never broken in the first place, because the government's ability to pay benefits does not in any way depend on the balance in the Social Security or Medicare Trust Funds. Benefit checks come directly from the Treasury, and, as Alan Greenspan has admitted, "[A] government cannot become insolvent with respect to obligations in its own currency."

And so the question is not whether the government needs to make "tough choices" in order to keep these vital programs afloat. The question is, will politicians make the toughest choice of all and tell the American people the truth: Social Security and Medicare face no financial crisis now or in the future.
You see? Deficits don't matter because the US can always monetize any debt in its own currency. This is becoming standard thinking among liberals, not just Galbraith and Klein.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-27-2010, 12:13 PM
badhatharry badhatharry is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: eastern sierra
Posts: 5,413
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

This was kinda like a totally interesting discussion of the current financial space.

Mike explains the best time for the government to step into the economy....when the smart money isn't.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-27-2010, 12:23 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Nice discussion about finance reform (or rather regulation) bill.

Annie and Mike interact very nicely. They are both sweet, smart and knowledgeable. I'll leave the comments on their physical appearance for others to make, although I doubt anything negative could possibly be said. Oh, youth!


The last section was, although a more trivial concern, a very timely one, regarding facebook privacy issues. Having started, for still unclear reasons, a facebook page just recently, I can relate very well to the issues discussed. I found the discussion about the way the "Millenials" view these privacy concerns particularly interesting, as it relates to my children's age. But, the idea of only sharing what you wouldn't mind your mother or your boss to know is a simple rule of thumb. In my case, I tend to think of what I wouldn't mind that much if my patients found out. Of course, then I have to think about what my friends post that shows up on my wall, and then it starts to get tricky... Especially when friends start to get overly excited posting glamorous photos of celebrities in various degrees of limited clothing.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-27-2010, 01:30 PM
conncarroll conncarroll is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 105
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Quote:
Originally Posted by badhatharry View Post
This was kinda like a totally interesting discussion of the current financial space.

Mike explains the best time for the government to step into the economy....when the smart money isn't.
Do progressives like Annie and Mike pause for even a second to wonder if just maybe the market is telling us something when no bank wants to be making mortgages. Maybe housing prices are too high and need to be corrected? Maybe we've already invested too many of the eocnomis resources into housing and we need to scale back?

No, of course not, says Mike. Government was created for this purpose! Just reinflate the bubble!

This is exactly why Fannie and Freddie must die and sooner rather than later.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-27-2010, 01:41 PM
claymisher claymisher is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newbridge, NJ
Posts: 2,673
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Quote:
Originally Posted by conncarroll View Post
Do progressives like Annie and Mike pause for even a second to wonder if just maybe the market is telling us something when no bank wants to be making mortgages. Maybe housing prices are too high and need to be corrected? Maybe we've already invested too many of the eocnomis resources into housing and we need to scale back?

No, of course not, says Mike. Government was created for this purpose! Just reinflate the bubble!

This is exactly why Fannie and Freddie must die and sooner rather than later.
If you really think that's what Mike thinks then you're even dumber than I thought.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-27-2010, 01:41 PM
SaraK SaraK is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 24
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Good discussion. I like that Annie made sure to stop and summarize what Frannie and Freddie were -- in this case I knew, but in analogous situations in other BHs on topics that are more far afield for me, I don't, and I wish BH would more strongly encourage this type of quick review.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-27-2010, 02:29 PM
JoeK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

You commie-socialists are going to lose again; just like you lost 1989. Then it was Berlin Wall that came crashing, this time around European welfare states will crash and burn for everybody to see. You won't be able to deny it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-27-2010, 05:08 PM
AemJeff AemJeff is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,750
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeK View Post
You commie-socialists are going to lose again; just like you lost 1989. Then it was Berlin Wall that came crashing, this time around European welfare states will crash and burn for everybody to see. You won't be able to deny it.
Wow, Joe! Take your medication, man, you'll feel better after you get some sleep!
__________________
-A. E. M. Jeff (Eponym)
Magnets - We know how they work!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-27-2010, 07:49 PM
conncarroll conncarroll is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 105
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Quote:
Originally Posted by claymisher View Post
If you really think that's what Mike thinks then you're even dumber than I thought.
OK then. Educate me. What exactly did Mike mean when he said Fannie and Freddie's role in today's housing market is exactly why and when the guvment needs to interfere in the economy.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-27-2010, 10:10 PM
carkrueger carkrueger is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 93
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

The financial regulatory bill is a “disaster,” and its proposed consumer protection agency would create a Fannie and Freddie “on steroids,”

“The bill is a disaster because it doesn’t address the fundamental underlining causes of the economic issue, which were real estate and underwriting,” he said. “This bill became, ‘I want to score the most points against Wall Street.’

“You’ll basically have a consumer protection agency which decides to go out and in the morning and say, ‘well everybody who’s XYZ should have a loan, even though the local community bank says XYZ shouldn’t have a loan, because if we give them a loan, we know they’re not going to pay back,’” he said. “It’s going to become an agency that defines lending on social justice purposes instead of safety and soundness purposes.”

Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H. CNBC

I'll trust Judd Greggs word on this one.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-27-2010, 10:48 PM
kezboard kezboard is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Great Moravia
Posts: 1,117
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Quote:
I'll trust Judd Greggs word on this one.
Really.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-28-2010, 02:12 AM
Cain Cain is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 24
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

"totally radically."
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-28-2010, 09:45 PM
badhatharry badhatharry is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: eastern sierra
Posts: 5,413
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Quote:
Originally Posted by conncarroll View Post
Do progressives like Annie and Mike pause for even a second to wonder if just maybe the market is telling us something when no bank wants to be making mortgages. Maybe housing prices are too high and need to be corrected? Maybe we've already invested too many of the eocnomis resources into housing and we need to scale back?
I am convinced that this is a reflection of what economics majors are learning. Not 'what is the best, most prudent thing to do', but rather just 'do something, because we have all these totally bitchin' vehicles for interfering'. Smith would roll over. But maybe not...he knew a thing or two about human nature.

Have you ever seen this? This should be a part of the curriculum, but of course won't ever be. We're doomed!!!

Despite overwhelming evidence, Socialism does not go away. Like a vampire, it reappears and seemingly cannot be terminated. Like the vampire, it sucks the life out of each economy it touches. Despite experience, each new generation seems to produce gullible people lured by the siren song of socialism. Each generation seems destined to battle these false promises anew.

Last edited by badhatharry; 05-29-2010 at 12:26 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-28-2010, 09:54 PM
badhatharry badhatharry is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: eastern sierra
Posts: 5,413
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Quote:
Originally Posted by carkrueger View Post
The financial regulatory bill is a “disaster,” and its proposed consumer protection agency would create a Fannie and Freddie “on steroids,”

I'll trust Judd Greggs word on this one.
I really like Judd Gregg.

Does no one see that the government regulatory agencies are a complete and utter mess?....arguably worse than even the Congress? From the financial meltdown to our current disaster in the Gulf, they have been proven to be ineffectual when it counts and worse, corrupt.

What to do? Hmmmm, I know. Make more regulations and create more agencies!

Last edited by badhatharry; 05-28-2010 at 10:37 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-30-2010, 04:59 AM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa®ah
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kezboard View Post
Really.
LOL! I was just thinking the same thing.

It's comical how wingnuts (une autre) immediately promote anyone to the highest level as soon as he or she does or says something against Obama.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-31-2010, 01:22 PM
ledocs ledocs is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: France, Earth
Posts: 1,165
Default Re: Slow Bleed (Annie Lowrey & Mike Konczal)

Quote:
Originally Posted by conncarroll View Post
Do progressives like Annie and Mike pause for even a second to wonder if just maybe the market is telling us something when no bank wants to be making mortgages. Maybe housing prices are too high and need to be corrected? Maybe we've already invested too many of the eocnomis resources into housing and we need to scale back?
So how does the market self-correct if no bank writes mortgages? All transactions on the way down will be all-cash transactions? Or the only financing will be seller financing (but a lot of the housing stock is now owned by banks, so seller financing is bank financing)? Isn't the idea that the government helps to make a market by setting a floor on asset prices? Didn't that seem to work recently in the case of the US stock market, for example, when the DJIA had fallen to 6,600, from a high of about 14,000, before governments worldwide provided huge amounts of liquidity and guarantees to the credit markets? You've probably heard that "markets" tend to overshoot on both the upside and the downside. So perhaps the government has a role to play in making the housing correction less painful and quicker than it might otherwise be. But, yeah, the government might subsidize a mortgage on a house in a Detroit suburb that sold for $500,000 when it was built two-three years ago and is now selling for $250,000. And it might turn out that even $250,000 is too high for a while. So what? Your idea is that it should sit vacant until it finds an all-cash buyer? That's fine, if there are enough all-cash buyers to go around. But presumably there are not.

One would need to distinguish between too much housing, in the sense of too much physical housing stock, and too much housing, in the sense of a housing stock that was overvalued because, for example, too much household income was being allocated to mortgage payments, in the aggregate.

I tried to go to the segment that was most relevant here, the "101" intro to Fannie and Freddie provided by Ms. Lowrey. I found that introduction to be sadly wanting and very difficult to listen to. But in any event, Conn, you'll find that Ross Levine, also a "liberal," thinks that too much capital was allocated to housing. It is not primarily liberal economists who watched the bubble get inflated without a peep: see Shiller, Krugman, Dean Baker. That's on your guys, mostly, isn't it?
__________________
ledocs

Last edited by ledocs; 05-31-2010 at 01:28 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-24-2010, 06:14 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa®ah
Posts: 21,798
Default On a somewhat peripheral note, ...

... one aspect of FinReg that is provoking a bit of discussion is the question of whether to regulate car loans made by dealers. I'm not really ready to discuss that at the moment, but I wanted to pass along this post by Matt Yglesias (via), just because it's interesting. Matt looks at one little-known aspect: the car loan infrastructure as a way to launder drug money.

(To further justify the inclusion of this post in this thread, I'll note that Matt links to a post that Annie did on the more mainstream concerns related to car loans and why they should be a part of FinReg. (Spoiler alert: they probably won't be.))
__________________
Brendan

Last edited by bjkeefe; 06-24-2010 at 06:18 PM..
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.