Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-06-2009, 12:00 AM
Bloggingheads Bloggingheads is offline
BhTV staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default Worldwise: Central and South East Asia (Sundaa Bridgett Jones & Alanna Shaikh)

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-06-2009, 01:02 AM
kidneystones
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Excellent

Welcome to Sundaa and Alanna.

Thanks to both for an interesting and fresh view of some difficult challenges. This link provides a lot of information about Aid programs in Kyrgyztan and other nations. I've no idea how accurate the information is. I also found I had to consult a map to get a decent basic understanding of the geography of the nations discussed.

I don't know if Sundaa and Alanna can provide a few more links, but I'd certainly appreciate any they might care to recommend.

Last edited by kidneystones; 10-06-2009 at 11:45 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-06-2009, 07:52 AM
DenvilleSteve DenvilleSteve is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,460
Default Democrats dither while thinly deployed American soldiers get picked off

regarding the diavlog, there was mention of community orgainizing in Pakistan. That seems wrong to me on a at least 2 levels. So, whatever.

What are democrats going to do about the American soldiers they have placed on the front lines in Afg? I am sure the strategy of deploying small detachments in remote locations has merit and is an effective counter insurgency tactic. While these detachments can defend themselves under most circumstances, the insurgents appear to have the advantage on the initial attack ( they fire first ) and the ability to overrun the outpost with their superior numbers. In both circumstances, the Americans need to be greater in number in order to better protect themselves. To detect the initial attack we need more monitoring equipment and people. To prevent being overrun, there have to be rapid response reinforcements within xxx distance of all remote outposts.

Why are democrats so unwilling to send in more soldiers? The additional troops would be tasked to defend those who are already in the field. No mission creep. Just less KIA.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-06-2009, 10:06 AM
Simon Willard Simon Willard is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The sylvan exurbs west of Boston Massachusetts.
Posts: 1,328
Default Re: Democrats dither while thinly deployed American soldiers get picked off

Quote:
Originally Posted by DenvilleSteve View Post
The additional troops would be tasked to defend those who are already in the field. No mission creep. Just less KIA.
Nothing is that simple. More troops means more targets, possibly more KIA.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-06-2009, 10:26 AM
DenvilleSteve DenvilleSteve is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,460
Default Re: Democrats dither while thinly deployed American soldiers get picked off

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Willard View Post
Nothing is that simple. More troops means more targets, possibly more KIA.
how do we know that? Is that what Obama thinks? If that is the objection, that more troops means more killed, then you have to replace the commanders. After all, they want more troops.

Obama, Jones and Biden think the way to win in Afg is to intervene with the US military as little as possible. I think there is merit to that. It pushes the Afg government to be more effective. Increasing the number of soldiers does not interfere with that policy. It provides more protection to the troops that are deployed.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-06-2009, 10:35 AM
Stapler Malone Stapler Malone is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 213
Default Re: Democrats dither while thinly deployed American soldiers get picked off

Quote:
Originally Posted by DenvilleSteve View Post
...Why are democrats so unwilling to send in more soldiers?...
Even in a diavlog explicitly not about military affairs in AfPak, here we go again...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-06-2009, 12:34 PM
DenvilleSteve DenvilleSteve is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,460
Default Re: Democrats dither while thinly deployed American soldiers get picked off

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stapler Malone View Post
Even in a diavlog explicitly not about military affairs in AfPak, here we go again...
it is my opinion democrats are not alarmed by the casualty rate of American soldiers in Afg because few from their ranks serve in the combat arms.

If any from the WH had a personel connection to the soldiers manning those remote outposts would they make different decisions regarding force protection of those locations?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-06-2009, 12:48 PM
piscivorous piscivorous is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,593
Default Re: Democrats dither while thinly deployed American soldiers get picked off

Captain Joseph Robinette "Beau" Biden III.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-06-2009, 01:08 PM
DenvilleSteve DenvilleSteve is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,460
Default Re: Democrats dither while thinly deployed American soldiers get picked off

Quote:
Originally Posted by piscivorous View Post
Captain Joseph Robinette "Beau" Biden III.
it is not the same thing. he serves in the signal corp. http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/9t6No...WUN/Beau+Biden

If you are going to assert the democrats are concerned for the fate of the soldiers on the front lines, then explain why they are denying them the force protection they need.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-06-2009, 01:16 PM
piscivorous piscivorous is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,593
Default Re: Democrats dither while thinly deployed American soldiers get picked off

force protection is not the sine qua non of counter-insurgency; population protection is. A move to a counter-insurgency campaign from the counter-terrorist campaign we are currently conducting will result in higher initial casualty rates no matter the force levels.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-06-2009, 11:26 PM
PreppyMcPrepperson PreppyMcPrepperson is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 714
Default Re: Worldwise: Central and South East Asia (Sundaa Bridgett Jones & Alanna Shaikh)

This diavlog is called "Central and South East Asia." Wrong. Central Asia extends down through Iran. South East Asia starts in Myanmar. What's in between--Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh--is South Asia, and it's culturally and politically a different place from the region's on either side. Indeed, the Himalayan parts of South Asia are culturally and politically different from the coastal parts of South Asia.

The diavloggers used the term South Asia during the chat, but also Southeast, to refer to the area south and east of Iran. That technical error is troubling insofar as our success in the region is premised on understanding what we're dealing with.
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.