Originally Posted by sugarkang
I think most commenters thought he was at least smug despite having better arguments. I wonder if those two things cancel each other out.
I think the smug judgment was nearly universal. I think that the "better arguments" piece is almost completely dependent on what commenters thought before the diavlog. Those who already agreed with Williamson would have been inclined to see the wisdom of his arguments. Those who didn't already agree with him would have been inclined to see the folly of said arguments.