Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 04-01-2011, 08:19 PM
Bill Scher Bill Scher is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 83
Default Re: The Week in Blog: Pols, Polls, and Poles (Bill Scher & Kristen Soltis)

Quote:
Originally Posted by badhatharry View Post
So is the standard a matter of timing? Are you saying that there would have been a different outcome if the vote had taken place closer to the invasion? say February 2003?
I don't know what you mean by "the standard." But my comments in the thread are not about technical legal standards, just about the argument whether Bush seriously "consulted" Congress before decided to attack Iraq. And in that instance, it's not just that the AUMF vote happened 160 days prior to the attack. It's that a major development happened between the vote and the attack -- a UN inspection that came up empty -- and that did not trigger any formal revisiting of the AUMF. If the Bush administration really felt that they could not launch an attack without a real endorsement from Congress, and it returned to Congress for a vote in March 2003 without any WMD found, sure, the outcome could have been different.
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.