Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-02-2010, 09:43 AM
Me&theboys Me&theboys is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 447
Default Re: Why no mention of Lawrence H. Keeley?

Originally Posted by Florian View Post
For one thing, the only conceivable objects of contention would be food and sexual partners, and Rousseau thought that neither would be a sufficient causes of belligerence and aggression in the absence of other objects of desire, which only civilization makes possible. Evolutionary biologists think otherwise, but I have never been able to understand why.
Let's try the experiment. On an island, let's put a large cohort of 15-35 year old males, along with unlimited cultural resources, opportunities for rewarding productivity, plenty of entertainment and sufficient other objects of desire, but insufficient food to meet everyone's needs and a ratio of 10 men to every woman. Then let's sit back and see what unfolds. I predict the men will fight each other over access to the food and women, no matter how many ipods and video games and symphonies and art galleries and libraries are available. What do you predict?
Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.