Originally Posted by badhatharry
You think somehow that I am supposed to be cowed by some guy on the internet saying that Rutan is in error. I suppose you also think that I should change my mind about the whole issue because some guy on the internt thinks that Rutan has a completely inaccurate view.
I doubt very much that you have any notion about what the real issues are in this conflict and that is why you have to use some guy on the internet's words instead of your own.
No I don't think any of that stuff, but thanks again for the errant interpretations of my posts. More holes in your credibility.
My actual view is that arguing with you and others on this subject is no different than refuting the claims of birthers, truthers, paranoid conspiracy theorists, and the like. Those who doggedly cling to concepts that fly in the face of overwhelming evidence, and expert consensus.
You have your mind made up and eat up anything that supports your foregone conclusions.
And it's laughable when you, and those like you try to accuse others, especially 98% of the scientific community
, of doing the same!