Go Back   Bloggingheads Community > Diavlog comments
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Diavlog comments Post comments about particular diavlogs here.
(Users cannot create new threads.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-16-2010, 11:04 AM
Bloggingheads Bloggingheads is offline
BhTV staff
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default Science Saturday: Like Animals

Technical difficulties

As several viewers noticed, this diavlog was posted this morning but then became unavailable for a few hours today. It's viewable now. We apologize for any confusion.

--BhTV staff

Last edited by David; 01-16-2010 at 02:30 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-16-2010, 12:08 PM
Craig McGillivary Craig McGillivary is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 12
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Breaking the Spell did not compare teaching your kid religion to leaving your swimming pool unfenced. It said that religion is a like a swimming pool. You must take reasonable precautions to prevent people in your faith from becoming crazed suicide bombers etc. One precaution would be to educate your kid on all the other religions in the world and what other people believe. Another would be to encourage the scientific study of religion and to use what it tells us.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-16-2010, 12:11 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

I can't access the diavlog. Does anybody else have that problem?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-16-2010, 12:21 PM
osmium osmium is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: new yorkistan
Posts: 708
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocean View Post
I can't access the diavlog. Does anybody else have that problem?
Yes, me too.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-16-2010, 12:42 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by osmium View Post
Yes, me too.
We've been forsaken! Oh my!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-16-2010, 01:13 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkepticDoc View Post
I've had problems with Firefox, Google Chrome appears to work faster and more reliably!

The diavlog is excellent, they cover several recent discussion topics.
This is not a problem loading. There is no diavlog. None. Just a bunch of letters like this:

{/exp:weblog:entries}

Ealier I saw the diavlog but it wasn't loading properly. Now it's gone... sniff...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-16-2010, 01:21 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkepticDoc View Post
The "Young Earth" creationists and Christian fundies are sabotaging BhTv...
It could be those New Pantheist Converts...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-16-2010, 01:50 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Now I can see the diavlog. But SkepticDoc's comments have disappeared.

This is great!!! What a mystery!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-16-2010, 01:12 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa®ah
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocean View Post
I can't access the diavlog. Does anybody else have that problem?
Yes. I do, too.

I'm guessing from the lack of a link on the bh.tv home page that they know there's something wrong. If SciSat doesn't start working soon, maybe an email would be in order, though. (I'm still catching up on earlier forums at the moment.)
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-16-2010, 01:18 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjkeefe View Post
Yes. I do, too.

I'm guessing from the lack of a link on the bh.tv home page that they know there's something wrong. If SciSat doesn't start working soon, maybe an email would be in order, though. (I'm still catching up on earlier forums at the moment.)
Thank you. We'll have to wait for BhTV staff to figure it out. It is strange that some other commenters had access. Hmmm... the plot thickens...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-16-2010, 03:11 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

It's was more than worth the long wait and the silliness the delay engendered!

This was a very interesting diavlog which nicely put together and summarized a number of topics that have been discussed in this forum recently. It's great to listen to people who are intelligent, thoughtful and more interested in communicating effectively than in winning points.

Frans is right. The fact that living in large groups makes us act in a competitive way, doesn't mean we are irreversibly competitive.

Frans and David talked about how empathy switches, sometimes rather abruptly to more hostile feelings towards others. But they didn't really discuss why that happens. Aggression from those who were part of the group before can discourage feelings of empathy from those who have been harmed.

I'm looking forward to others' comments.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-16-2010, 04:23 PM
BornAgainDemocrat BornAgainDemocrat is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: near Chattanooga
Posts: 826
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocean View Post
It's great to listen to people who are intelligent, thoughtful and more interested in communicating effectively than in winning points.
Yes indeed. No chimps they! I thought the speed dating study was interesting: we tend to like people of the opposite sex who mirror our own behavior. Or in the words of Oscar Wilde, "My idea of an agreeable person is someone who agrees with me." I suppose this explains why liberals and conservatives tend to have so little empathy with each other, especially over the internet, where you cannot see each other.

Last edited by BornAgainDemocrat; 01-16-2010 at 04:52 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:26 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa®ah
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by BornAgainDemocrat View Post
Yes indeed. No chimps they! I thought the speed dating study was interesting: we tend to like people of the opposite sex who mirror our own behavior.
On the other hand, one very effective way to annoy someone, as every child is able to figure out by about age five, is to imitate that person as closely as possible.

I think it is also true that even apart from this trick (which could be explained away as mockery, granted), there is something that provokes irritation between two people who are "too much alike." Further, there is a reason "opposites attract" is a cliché -- as with many clichés, it touches on something that is sometimes quite true.

Nitpicking, maybe, and I've never speed-dated, but all I can say is that my favorite significant others and longest-lasting relationships involved women whose "arty/poetic nature" and higher reliance on emotions contrasted with, and more importantly, complimented my sometimes excessive emphasis on rationality and Being Serious.
__________________
Brendan

Last edited by bjkeefe; 01-16-2010 at 05:33 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-16-2010, 07:01 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Did they talk about dating in this diavlog? I truly don't remember if they did. I must have dissociated during that part of the diavlog!

And yes, a combination of some shared interest and some complementary traits probably is essential to successful relationships. But, I'm clearly not an expert.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-17-2010, 11:15 AM
BornAgainDemocrat BornAgainDemocrat is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: near Chattanooga
Posts: 826
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjkeefe View Post
On the other hand, one very effective way to annoy someone, as every child is able to figure out by about age five, is to imitate that person as closely as possible.

I think it is also true that even apart from this trick (which could be explained away as mockery, granted), there is something that provokes irritation between two people who are "too much alike." Further, there is a reason "opposites attract" is a cliché -- as with many clichés, it touches on something that is sometimes quite true.

Nitpicking, maybe, and I've never speed-dated, but all I can say is that my favorite significant others and longest-lasting relationships involved women whose "arty/poetic nature" and higher reliance on emotions contrasted with, and more importantly, complimented my sometimes excessive emphasis on rationality and Being Serious.
Good points, BJ. Same story with my wife. I think anonymity on the internet, plus lack of facial communication, contribute to the flame wars.

Last edited by BornAgainDemocrat; 01-17-2010 at 11:18 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-16-2010, 06:51 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by BornAgainDemocrat View Post
Yes indeed. No chimps they! I thought the speed dating study was interesting: we tend to like people of the opposite sex who mirror our own behavior. Or in the words of Oscar Wilde, "My idea of an agreeable person is someone who agrees with me." I suppose this explains why liberals and conservatives tend to have so little empathy with each other, especially over the internet, where you cannot see each other.
"Mirroring" in body language is a powerful way of connecting with others. But, if it's done deliberately it may be exaggerated and trigger the opposite effect. What's really interesting is that people tend to mirror those they like. So it is a positive feedback mechanism. The process, when spontaneous, is more or less subconscious.

When it comes to political discourse, the written word is more likely to end up polarizing opinions. When people have to negotiate and compromise they know that meeting face to face is a more positive way of communicating.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-16-2010, 07:01 PM
look look is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,886
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocean View Post
"Mirroring" in body language is a powerful way of connecting with others. But, if it's done deliberately it may be exaggerated and trigger the opposite effect. What's really interesting is that people tend to mirror those they like. So it is a positive feedback mechanism. The process, when spontaneous, is more or less subconscious.

When it comes to political discourse, the written word is more likely to end up polarizing opinions. When people have to negotiate and compromise they know that meeting face to face is a more positive way of communicating.
It's a wonder that message boarding is so popular. So much room for misunderstanding without visible cues.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-16-2010, 07:09 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by look View Post
It's a wonder that message boarding is so popular. So much room for misunderstanding without visible cues.
I agree. But advocates of this form of communication may tell you that it forces them to find other effective ways of expressing themselves while bypassing body language.

I think another serious problem is projection. If you find someone with compatible ideas, you may start to build a fantasy image about those qualities that you still don't know about.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-16-2010, 07:10 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa®ah
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by look View Post
It's a wonder that message boarding is so popular. So much room for misunderstanding without visible cues.
I do take your point, but there is also:

1. The attraction of the challenge of trying to express oneself when text is all that is available. (Oh, and pictures, too, to be fussy.)

2. The freedom to say things that might not be so easy to say in person. While this leads to a lot of undesirable behavior, it also means some things get said that ought to be said.

3. The advantage that communicating in writing sometimes offers over speaking face-to-face, in that complex thoughts can be laid out without interruption.

4. The clarification one sometimes finds by the very virtue of having to put a feeling or vague notion into words.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-16-2010, 07:12 PM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjkeefe View Post
I do take your point, but there is also:

1. The attraction of the challenge of trying to express oneself when text is all that is available. (Oh, and pictures, too, to be fussy.)

2. The freedom to say things that might not be so easy to say in person. While this leads to a lot of undesirable behavior, it also means some things get said that ought to be said.

3. The advantage that communicating in writing sometimes offers over speaking face-to-face, in that complex thoughts can be laid out without interruption.

4. The clarification one sometimes finds by the very virtue of having to put a feeling or vague notion into words.
What was I saying just a minute ago...?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 01-16-2010, 07:18 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa®ah
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocean View Post
What was I saying just a minute ago...?
Yes. How rude of you to type while I was!

__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-16-2010, 09:57 PM
look look is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 2,886
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocean View Post
What was I saying just a minute ago...?
Yes, thanks to you both for your thoughts.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-16-2010, 03:31 PM
Wonderment Wonderment is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,694
Default Difference between "perspective taking" and "theory of mind"

Can someone explain the difference between what Frans calls "perspective taking" in chimpanzees and "theory of mind?" Theory of mind is often claimed to be an exclusively human capability.

I understand that "perspective taking" is a more modest claim, but I'd like to see some discussion of it. Here is the Wikipedia definition of "theory of mind":

Quote:
Theory of mind is the ability to attribute mental states—beliefs, intents, desires, pretending, knowledge, etc.—to oneself and others and to understand that others have beliefs, desires and intentions that are different from one's own.
__________________
Seek Peace and Pursue it
בקש שלום ורדפהו
Busca la paz y síguela
--Psalm 34:15
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-16-2010, 04:45 PM
Frans de Waal Frans de Waal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7
Default Re: Difference between "perspective taking" and "theory of mind"

Yes, the two are related. Theory-of-mind is a rather cognitive affair, thought, having to do with me knowing what you know, or think, whereas perspective-taking is much broader and also includes me wanting to know how you feel, or what you need, and being affected by your feelings. I'd argue that there is no evidence that we, humans, have theories about each other. We rather respond to body language and situational information. The term theory-of-mind makes it sound as if it all happens in our heads, whereas modern knowledge tells us that what we know about others is built up, at least initially, by bodies talking to bodies. This also applies to other primates.

For more on this, see:
http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/features/251555/sept
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-16-2010, 07:14 PM
Wonderment Wonderment is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,694
Default Re: Difference between "perspective taking" and "theory of mind"

Thanks for clarifying and expanding, Professor.

And thanks for your body of work which has greatly enriched my life and helped me become a happier ape.
__________________
Seek Peace and Pursue it
בקש שלום ורדפהו
Busca la paz y síguela
--Psalm 34:15
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-16-2010, 07:18 PM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa®ah
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Difference between "perspective taking" and "theory of mind"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frans de Waal View Post
Yes, the two are related. Theory-of-mind is a rather cognitive affair, thought, having to do with me knowing what you know, or think, whereas perspective-taking is much broader and also includes me wanting to know how you feel, or what you need, and being affected by your feelings. I'd argue that there is no evidence that we, humans, have theories about each other. We rather respond to body language and situational information. The term theory-of-mind makes it sound as if it all happens in our heads, whereas modern knowledge tells us that what we know about others is built up, at least initially, by bodies talking to bodies. This also applies to other primates.

For more on this, see:
http://www.naturalhistorymag.com/features/251555/sept
Thanks for the link -- a good read -- and also for the diavlog and for checking into the forums.
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-16-2010, 08:44 PM
Baltimoron Baltimoron is offline
Deactivated User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Busan, South Korea (ROK)
Posts: 1,690
Send a message via Skype™ to Baltimoron
Default Re: Difference between "perspective taking" and "theory of mind"

Talk about a knife cutting through the fog! This explanation reminds me of Koreans telling me, that westerners think with their minds; Koreans also think with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-16-2010, 06:23 PM
radmul radmul is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Superstition poisons reason. As long as you resort to nonsense you will have no argument. I know you want there to be a god , I empathize, but superstition is still superstition and always will be.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-16-2010, 08:06 PM
MargaretH MargaretH is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lexington MA
Posts: 29
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

This was a very useful diavlog. It helps me understand factors that contribute to my feeling that society at large is mad. It also reminds me of a lecture I heard by Robert Putnam, who wrote Bowling Alone and other titles. Putnam discusses the ideas of bonding and bridging as fundamental to human society. With our potential social group growing ever larger and stress-provoking, the need to bond within a comprehensible smaller group (a mega church, tea party, progressive democrat group, pro-life group, etc.) is very strong. The impulse to bridge (feel empathy with) to another group--particularly one with which I've already formed a negative bias--is difficult.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-17-2010, 11:41 AM
BornAgainDemocrat BornAgainDemocrat is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: near Chattanooga
Posts: 826
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by MargaretH View Post
This was a very useful diavlog. It helps me understand factors that contribute to my feeling that society at large is mad. It also reminds me of a lecture I heard by Robert Putnam, who wrote Bowling Alone and other titles. Putnam discusses the ideas of bonding and bridging as fundamental to human society. With our potential social group growing ever larger and stress-provoking, the need to bond within a comprehensible smaller group (a mega church, tea party, progressive democrat group, pro-life group, etc.) is very strong. The impulse to bridge (feel empathy with) to another group--particularly one with which I've already formed a negative bias--is difficult.
Apropos, there was a recent story in Science Daily, Rural America More Prosperous Than Expected, Study Finds, which found that "Geographical factors like climate, topography, distances to cities and airports, and interstate highways are unimportant in distinguishing prosperous counties from others. Instead, the results supported what many rural people believe to be true -- civically engaged religious groups and a common ancestry can really matter."

The article went on to reference "impressive stories that link local churches, a shared ethnic identity, small colleges, locally owned manufacturing, innovative farmers, and extraordinary cooperation and civic engagement to job creation, education, and housing."

At the end it depressingly noted there were "few prosperous rural counties with a minority concentration."
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 01-16-2010, 08:40 PM
Ken Davis Ken Davis is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Western Appalachia
Posts: 193
Default Re: Empathy

In her beautiful 1987 book The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World, Elaine Scarry said that most of the time our first response when someone tells us they are in pain is to doubt it. This sounds reasonable to me as I recall my junior high football coach in my face yelling "you're not hurt!", "shake it off!", and "sissy!". I wonder if the lower apes feign pain in order to gain favors or light duty, as human beings are wont to do, resulting in the inculcation within us higher apes of the skepticism of which Scarry wrote?

Last edited by Ken Davis; 01-16-2010 at 08:43 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-16-2010, 09:08 PM
chamblee54 chamblee54 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 319
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

This is technically out to lunch. The guys are talking through voice synthesizers. The result is unlistenable.
__________________
Chamblee54
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-16-2010, 09:12 PM
Baltimoron Baltimoron is offline
Deactivated User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Busan, South Korea (ROK)
Posts: 1,690
Send a message via Skype™ to Baltimoron
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

My audio is clear.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-16-2010, 09:10 PM
Baltimoron Baltimoron is offline
Deactivated User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Busan, South Korea (ROK)
Posts: 1,690
Send a message via Skype™ to Baltimoron
Default That's a Diavlog!

For the record, I'd like to exclaim that, and register my vote for newer faces connected to knowledgeable people who don't resort to boilerplate or appeal to the lowest common denominator.

That said, I don't conceive of social groups and individuality distinct tactics in survival. I think humans, and to a certain sense scientists are currently studying in other mammals and species, use both cohesion and individuality as competitive tactics against other species, and more so on the past when there was a real battle. For instance, offspring require a long period of maturation and socialization to reach adulthood, longer than most other species. It's that process, when humans learn the line between self and group, that ensures survival.

Aren't we also conflating sexual and natural selection?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-17-2010, 02:32 AM
wreaver wreaver is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 96
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Regarding this portion of the video...

http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/253...2:02&out=24:06

I believe that neither Frans de Waal or David Berreby understands why some people don't want Socialized Medicine.

They seem to characterize one being against Socialized Medicine as going against human nature by turning off their empathizing "drive".

Humans do not only have a "drive" towards empathizing. But they also have a "drive" towards fairness. Some people see having money taken from them to pay for other people's medicine as unfair. (Some even see it as theft.)

Note, I'm not trying to argue for or against this position. But only trying to point out my observation as to why some people are against Socialize Medicine. And that I believe Frans de Waal and David Berreby have (I'd assume unintentionally) created a straw man as to why some people as against Socialized Medicine.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-17-2010, 09:39 AM
bjkeefe bjkeefe is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Not Real America, according to St. Sa®ah
Posts: 21,798
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by wreaver View Post
[...] They seem to characterize one being against Socialized Medicine as going against human nature by turning off their empathizing "drive".

Humans do not only have a "drive" towards empathizing. But they also have a "drive" towards fairness. Some people see having money taken from them to pay for other people's medicine as unfair. (Some even see it as theft.)
Yes, but wouldn't you agree that at some point, insisting on what is "fair" amounts to ignoring one's instinct for empathy? Seems to me that when one says, "This is my money, I worked for it, and no one else is entitled to it," however legitimate that view may be, it means "I am not going to give even a portion of it to someone less fortunate."
__________________
Brendan
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-17-2010, 02:28 PM
wreaver wreaver is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 96
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjkeefe View Post
Yes, but wouldn't you agree that at some point, insisting on what is "fair" amounts to ignoring one's instinct for empathy?
If you are suggesting that these people who are against Socialized Medicine feel a "drive" for empathy and a "drive" for fairness (and that they are both of equal strength), and choose fairness over empathy, I'm not convinced that that is actually the cognition going on.

I'm reminded of Jonathan Haidt and Joshua Knobe's BloogingHeads episode...

http://bloggingheads.tv/diavlogs/13700

And I think I agree with Jonathan Haidt in that, I think people actually have different kinds of cognition going on. (And don't have the equal "drives".)

I don't think these people who are against Socialized Medicine are even feeling a empathetic "drive" in this situation. (Or at least, not feeling any significant empathetic "drive", relative to their fairness "drive". I.e., the fairness "drive" is overwhelming.)

(I think that it is the taxation part of it that is preventing them from feeling an empathetic "drive", and is instead triggering their fairness "drive". Contrast that with something like charity, which I believe would trigger their empathetic "drive". And just to be explicit, these people don't conflate taxation with charity.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjkeefe View Post
Seems to me that when one says, "This is my money, I worked for it, and no one else is entitled to it," however legitimate that view may be, it means "I am not going to give even a portion of it to someone less fortunate."
Regarding, "I am not going to give even a portion of it to someone less fortunate". I don't believe that this is quite accurate, from their point-of-view.

The problem these kind of people have is that they are not "giving" their money, but their money is being "taken".

To figure out their position on "giving to the less fortunate", I think you'd need to look at charitable giving from these people (instead of something paid through taxation).
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-17-2010, 03:05 PM
Wonderment Wonderment is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,694
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Regarding, "I am not going to give even a portion of it to someone less fortunate". I don't believe that this is quite accurate, from their point-of-view.

The problem these kind of people have is that they are not "giving" their money, but their money is being "taken".

To figure out their position on "giving to the less fortunate", I think you'd need to look at charitable giving from these people (instead of something paid through taxation).
You make some good points. I would have chosen a less ambiguous example of sadistic bigotry: opposition to same-sex marriage. That, like racism in the old days, is a more clear-cut example of "turning off" empathy to the outcast group.
__________________
Seek Peace and Pursue it
בקש שלום ורדפהו
Busca la paz y síguela
--Psalm 34:15
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-17-2010, 09:52 AM
Ocean Ocean is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: US Northeast
Posts: 6,784
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by wreaver View Post
Humans do not only have a "drive" towards empathizing. But they also have a "drive" towards fairness. Some people see having money taken from them to pay for other people's medicine as unfair. (Some even see it as theft.)
It all depends on how you define fairness. If understood by your paragraph above, it seems to be a very limited and shortsighted view of fairness.

You can't define fairness at one discrete point in time. The same person who has to contribute money for someone else's medicine today, may need others to contribute for their own health care tomorrow.

In my opinion most of the people that make the kind of argument that you describe, are people in a position of privilege who don't need help from others now and don't anticipate they will need it tomorrow. They can ignore those who don't have the same level of privilege and come up with all kinds of justifications for their position that is selfish and, indeed, lacks empathy.

Empathy, in the sense discussed in this diavlog, implies having a sense of community and understanding that we all share responsibility for the well being of the rest of the members of that community.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-17-2010, 03:20 PM
wreaver wreaver is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 96
Default Re: Science Saturday: Like Animals

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocean View Post
It all depends on how you define fairness.
I wasn't trying to define fairness at all. I was only talking about fairness "drive".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocean View Post
If understood by your paragraph above, it seems to be a very limited and shortsighted view of fairness.
Please refrain from making Ad Hominem attacks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocean View Post
You can't define fairness at one discrete point in time. The same person who has to contribute money for someone else's medicine today, may need others to contribute for their own health care tomorrow.
I see you want to get into a discussion about politics, which I really wasn't interested in having. I was more interesting in exploring how people think. But....

Regarding, "You can't define fairness at one discrete point in time." I'm not sure what you are saying here. Can you please rephrase this.
Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.