View Single Post
Old 01-05-2012, 08:41 AM
Unit Unit is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: LOL

Originally Posted by stephanie View Post
But not with legally recognized groups, not with the idea that a disparate impact is not a valid argument against a facially neutral law, which is what TS is arguing. At least, not based on the libertarians I know or my understanding of libertarianism. For example, they seem to think racism is not a longterm problem, as businesses would not be rational in discriminating, but only on focusing on more relevant "groups," such as those good at whatever the job requires. The fact that customers/clients might care about race, etc. seems to them not a concern.
Yes, I think you're right. Hayek had a preference for generic laws that did not go into details and applied to everyone equally. But libertarians are hardly alone in preferring equality in front of the law.
Reply With Quote