PDA

View Full Version : And Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”


Whatfur
03-27-2010, 05:00 PM
"And they cast lots to divide his garments."

Just thought this quote an appropriate and analogous title for a thread in which I will provide a few links to document the stupidity of the healthcare
bill as well as those who have foolishly and blindly gotten behind it.

Whatfur
03-27-2010, 05:02 PM
Lets start with with some admitted overreach... (http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/26/claire-mccaskill-hey-maybe-we-overpromised-on-obamacare/)

Whatfur
03-27-2010, 05:06 PM
My, my where was the AP the last few months...oh yeah servicing Obama (from under his desk). (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gmzNv5LYXOA6UM_XmUHdOe9augtQD9ELVL3G1)

Whatfur
03-27-2010, 05:18 PM
Wow...guess it was crowded under there. The NYT:

"Louisiana officials say a reduction in federal money to hospitals that treat the uninsured under the bill could be a death knell for their state-run charity hospital system" (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/27/health/policy/27impact.html?partner=rss&emc=rss)

.

Whatfur
03-27-2010, 05:25 PM
"AT&T Inc. will book $1 billion in first-quarter costs related to the health-care law signed this week by President Barack Obama, the most of any U.S. company so far." (http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-26/at-t-to-take-1-billion-charge-on-health-care-reform-update1-.html)

Whatfur
03-27-2010, 05:29 PM
Its not like they gave a shit what the American people thought to begin with... (http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/healthplan.php)

Whatfur
03-27-2010, 05:35 PM
...drawing stick people for stupid people. (http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/03/health_care_sick_care_and_obam.html)

Whatfur
03-27-2010, 05:38 PM
...from Fidel. (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Cuban-leader-applauds-US-apf-124808403.html?x=0&.v=1)

Whatfur
03-27-2010, 06:01 PM
...Shocked! I tell you. (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704100604575146002445136066.html?m od=WSJ_hpp_sections_opinion)

Whatfur
03-27-2010, 06:14 PM
A budget disaster. (http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=36217)

Whatfur
03-27-2010, 07:12 PM
Not! Fucking dumb asses.

Score this CBO. (http://article.nationalreview.com/429537/obamacare-dystopia/mark-steyn?page=1)

Whatfur
03-28-2010, 09:25 AM
"The Empire Strikes Back" (http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2010/03/025940.php)

Whatfur
03-28-2010, 09:36 AM
John Deere, Catepillar, Medtronics, Verizon, Boeing Co., Con-Way Inc., Exelon Corp., Navistar Inc., Verizon, Xerox Corp., Public Service Enterprise Group Inc., and Met Life Inc.

JonIrenicus
03-28-2010, 02:07 PM
I am becoming more and more stoic about these things. Maybe that is bad as it leads to more detachment, but like others have said, what cannot be sustained will not be sustained.


And if it turns out people are more comfortable in a heavier welfare and redistributive state, then so be it. Though I would at least like people to go in both eyes open before they make the leap.


Not based on emotion, but on a clear set of ideas about what they want, and the best path to get there. But it seems you need emotion to act or we are nothing more than logical husks, with no impulse to drive anything. So there we are. This is where cross societal analysis would come in handy, look around the world and see how others have handled their problems and how their choices have worked, both for good and ill.


Has anyone done that already?

Whatfur
03-28-2010, 04:28 PM
"Thugocracy" (http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZjU2Mzc0NTEwZTk2NGEyMzVjZmQ1M2VkODNkM2JhMWI=)

Whatfur
03-29-2010, 07:56 AM
Wake up people. The alarms are everywhere (http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/grim_sign_for_obamacare_nmwL14T53evpw8DGK9xEEI).

Whatfur
03-29-2010, 12:05 PM
Whoda thought that instead of premiums going down like President Obama has promised...they are going to go up!!! (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Top-insurance-exec-Your-health-premiums-will-go-up-coverage-will-change-under-Obamacare-89390487.html)

Whatfur
03-29-2010, 05:12 PM
Now this is just AP piling on. (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100329/ap_on_he_me/us_med_healthbeat_primary_care) How dare they? Don't they know which side they are on?

Whatfur
03-29-2010, 10:44 PM
...failed Econ 101. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/28/AR2010032802353.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns)

Whatfur
03-29-2010, 10:48 PM
The insurance "death spiral". (http://reason.com/blog/2010/03/29/insurance-death-spiral-here-we)

Whatfur
03-30-2010, 09:14 AM
...you might recognize them. (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304370304575152181030785348.html?m od=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories)

Whatfur
03-30-2010, 09:18 AM
...he eats everything. (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304370304575151682845921038.html?m od=WSJ_hpp_sections_opinion)

Whatfur
03-30-2010, 05:40 PM
Just one huge example of the lack of insight of this administration, its congress and this re-distribution of wealth masquerading as a Healthcare bill. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/business/30subsidy.html)

Whatfur
03-30-2010, 08:04 PM
Baaa, baaa, Baaa.... (http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDFkZmUyZDNlZTRjMWQ4YjI5YzI3NjA5NzdlNTU3M2Q=)

Whatfur
03-31-2010, 06:56 AM
Is anyone out there listening? (http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-03-29-health-poll_N.htm)

Whatfur
03-31-2010, 02:00 PM
...doesn't work with smalll businesses either (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/31/AR2010033100220.html)!

Whatfur
04-02-2010, 09:56 AM
Looking out for every....one. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3W8D7pflcwM)

Whatfur
04-02-2010, 11:48 AM
Small business welcomes new opportunities to lose money. (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/31/AR2010033100220.html)

Whatfur
04-02-2010, 08:47 PM
Another stupid poll...still looking for the basement. (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20001700-503544.html)

Whatfur
04-02-2010, 09:23 PM
Please read.

Whatfur
04-02-2010, 10:01 PM
Ummm....

"Obama's health care plan is a disaster" (http://www.statesman.com/opinion/perry-obamas-health-care-plan-is-a-disaster-505072.html)

Emphasis mine.

Whatfur
04-02-2010, 10:13 PM
Somewhere above or in something else I read it talked about the
ludicrousness of this healthcare bill being rammed through at the point
of a "Debt Disaster dead ahead (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0410/35307.html)".

Whatfur
04-06-2010, 08:28 AM
jobs...and little else. (http://townhall.com/columnists/JulieGunlock/2010/04/05/the_new_health_care_bill_is_a_jobs_killer)

Whatfur
04-06-2010, 08:32 AM
...shall see. (http://townhall.com/columnists/ByronYork/2010/04/05/what_was_obamacare_really_about)

Whatfur
04-09-2010, 06:57 AM
Lets not call them Death panels...lets call them "innovation" and "oversight board"s (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/business/economy/07leonhardt.html?hp)

Whatfur
04-13-2010, 06:34 AM
58% looking to overturn Obamacare...Obama also reaches new low in the polls...and heres some frosting...complete with a very apt PeeWee Herman video. (http://hotair.com/archives/2010/04/12/nyt-obamacare-may-have-accidentally-stripped-congress-of-health-coverage/)

Whatfur
04-18-2010, 05:50 PM
"All the news thats fit to print...eventually" (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/18/nyregion/18insure.html?hp)

Whatfur
04-23-2010, 06:56 PM
How can this be???
The governments OWN study contradicts everything we have been told to swallow? (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/news/ap/politics/2010/Apr/22/report__health_overhaul_will_increase_nation_s_tab .html)


[added] "We really don't know at this point." Film at 11 (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/04/23/sebelius_on_health_care_reform_we_dont_know_what_i ts_going_to_cost.html).

Whatfur
04-26-2010, 10:34 PM
What do you know...not doctors but a rationing panel.

Also not even Congress but non-elected officials will control healthcare policy and how it changes.

Video details... (http://www.breitbart.tv/obamas-budget-director-powerful-rationing-panel-not-doctors-will-control-health-care-levels)

Ain't this dandy.

Whatfur
05-06-2010, 12:00 PM
What opponents had said would come to pass is coming to pass. (http://money.cnn.com/2010/05/05/news/companies/dropping_benefits.fortune/)

Whatfur
05-16-2010, 10:00 PM
What opponents had said would come to pass is coming to pass. (http://money.cnn.com/2010/05/05/news/companies/dropping_benefits.fortune/)


More of the same... (http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/98025-health-reform-threatens-to-overwhelm-already-crammed-emergency-rooms)

“... expected that one of the initial impacts of reform would be less pressure on emergency departments; it’s going to be exactly the opposite over the next four to eight years,” ...

Whatfur
05-18-2010, 05:09 PM
I was telling you a year ago that you were being lied to. (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703315404575250264210294510.html?m od=rss_opinion_main)


baaa baaaa baaaa

Whatfur
05-22-2010, 05:14 PM
We said it was coming... (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37579.html)

A bad law showing its true colors.

Whatfur
06-01-2010, 01:58 PM
Oh Canada! (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100531/hl_nm/us_health_3)

Whatfur
06-04-2010, 05:58 PM
The NYTs keeps finding these problems after the fact. Hmmmm. (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/03/business/03dartmouth.html?partner=rss&emc=rss)

Whatfur
06-08-2010, 04:09 PM
"A Virginia-based insurance company says “considerable uncertainties” created by the Democrats’ health care overhaul will force it to close its doors by the end of the year." (http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0610/38194.html)

Whatfur
06-12-2010, 10:58 AM
Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and the rest of the Democratic liars dealing with returning chickens. (http://bloggingheads.tv/forum/showthread.php?p=165017#post165017)

Whatfur
06-13-2010, 08:49 AM
Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and the rest of the Democratic liars dealing with returning chickens. (http://bloggingheads.tv/forum/showthread.php?p=165017#post165017)

The latest from the CBO... (http://cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=1034)

"In CBO’s judgment, the health legislation enacted earlier this year does not substantially diminish that pressure. In fact, CBO estimated that the health legislation will increase the federal budgetary commitment to health care "

Whatfur
06-14-2010, 08:21 AM
Campaigning for a bill that has already passed...

Politics as usual. (http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columns/OpEd-Contributor/Sen-Tom-Coburn-Obamacare-PR-campaign-anchored-in-spin-not-reality-96054264.html)

bjkeefe
06-26-2010, 10:52 PM
[Ed. note: In the following blockquote, an irrelevant link -- pointing to nothing but regurgitation of the babblings of Laura Bush's ex-press secretary (http://mediamatters.org/blog/200903250010) -- has been omitted.]

Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and the rest of the Democratic liars dealing with returning chickens.

Thought you might enjoy this:

The Age of Nancy

Let us sing a song about the wonderfulness of Nancy Pelosi.

What a run she’s been on. This week — with the big financial reform package edging toward completion, and the House approving a major campaign finance reform bill — was a reminder of what an incredibly productive speaker she’s become.

Last winter, when Washington was backing away from the whole health care deal after the Republicans won Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat, Pelosi was uncowed. “We’ll go through the gate. If the gate’s closed, we’ll go over the fence. If the fence is too high, we’ll pole vault in,” she said. “If that doesn’t work, we’ll parachute in. But we’re going to get health care reform passed for the American people.”

I sort of like the image of Nancy Pelosi parachuting in. Would she wear her high heels? Probably not, but her hair would still look as if it had been blow-dried by a stylist on the way out of the airplane.

[...]

The Republicans have turned Pelosi into the Demon Grandmother — in ads, a satanic figure in the flames of deficit spending, or a 50-foot monster smashing houses with her big-government feet. (She seems utterly indifferent to the endless public pummeling — although she did express some dismay, in an interview with The Times’s Mark Leibovich, that people had been speculating that she might have had a face-lift.)

But even the public that likes the legislation she’s been churning out tends to underestimate her.

[...]

She is, at any rate, a person who combines the high ideals of politics with a sure grasp of the very practical realities. Some progressives will never forgive Pelosi for caving in to the anti-abortion forces during the health care negotiations or for giving the National Rifle Association an exemption in the new campaign finance legislation. But the real world has limits, and one of them is that there will never be a major bill to emerge from the House of Representatives that doesn’t have something regrettable in it.

Pelosi has actually been very good on ethics. Under her watch in the House, earmarks are fewer and more transparent. Travel rules are tighter. She fought for the creation of a new in-house watchdog, the Office of Congressional Ethics, pushing it over the wire by one vote. Since then, the aggressive ethics office has won the rancor of investigated members of Congress and the hearts of good-government groups.

“She bit the bullet,” said Sarah Dufendach, the vice president for legislative affairs at Common Cause. “That was a very heavy lift, to get the House to do that. I give her really high marks for that.”

Of all the good deeds for which people get punished in Washington, pushing ethics has to be at the top of the list. Your own members resent it, and the public doesn’t really give you any credit. It’s not likely that people will go to the polls in November and vote Democratic because the House, although still deeply, deeply imperfect, is run with a higher ethical standard than it was before Pelosi got control.

She has been around a long time and must have known that from the start. But she pushed anyway. Pelosi is an idealist working in the practical now. She genuinely sees her party as a vehicle for good and her pragmatism is not the least bit cynical. She is the most powerful woman in the country, the most fearless person on Capitol Hill and on track to be one of the most productive speakers in history.

I don’t know about you, but that kind of knocks me out.

(Source (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/opinion/26collins.html) | via (http://www.balloon-juice.com/2010/06/26/nancy-smash-bless-her/))

Whatfur
07-02-2010, 08:20 PM
More of what conservatives warned about prior to the bill signing finally being picked up and reported on. Go figure. (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100702/ap_on_he_me/us_med_er_crowding)

AemJeff
07-02-2010, 08:23 PM
More of what conservatives warned about prior to the bill signing finally being picked up and reported on. Go figure. (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100702/ap_on_he_me/us_med_er_crowding)

Tragedy!

Rand Corp. researcher Dr. Arthur L. Kellermann predicts this from the new law: "More people will have coverage and will be less afraid to go to the emergency department if they're sick or hurt and have nowhere else to go.... We just don't have other places in the system for these folks to go."

Whatfur
07-02-2010, 10:05 PM
Tragedy!

Yippee, quality of care and longer waits for everyone because people feel better now about leeching off the system that was already available to them prior to Obamacare. WooHoo!!!!

AemJeff
07-02-2010, 10:19 PM
Yippee, quality of care and longer waits for everyone because people feel better now about leeching off the system that was already available to them prior to Obamacare. WooHoo!!!!

Yeah! Poor sick people are scum! Wooooo!

Whatfur
07-02-2010, 10:32 PM
Yeah! Poor sick people are scum! Wooooo!

No, people trying to hold this up as a benefit of Obamacare are logically poor and moral scum.

In any case, Yeah!!! Let more die so things even out in liberal utopian dreamworld. Matter of fact...!...that may take care of the crowding problem!!! Woohoo!!!!

bjkeefe
07-02-2010, 11:17 PM
No, people trying to hold this up as a benefit of Obamacare are logically poor and moral scum.

If more poor sick people are getting better opportunities for health care, then hurrah! Today, we are all logically poor moral scum!

P.S. Isn't it a sign of just how wingnutty the wingnuts have become that the RealConservatives of today (like TSOF) can no longer accept the views of the RAND Corporation?

This proves that the DFHs have won! It is a great day for America.

bjkeefe
07-03-2010, 08:55 AM
Silly, stupid people defending the margins.

Better than your case -- a sad, stupid person offending at the margins.

Whatfur
07-03-2010, 08:59 AM
Better than your case -- a sad, stupid person offending at the margins.


Better than your case...not a apple but a fig.

bjkeefe
07-03-2010, 09:04 AM
Better than your case...not a apple but a fig.

So nervous trying to figure out how to create plausible deniability in your latest fag-bashing post you screwed up the indefinite article for the apple, I see.

Or was it just more of your semi-literacy?

In either case: thanks for the morning laugh!

Whatfur
07-03-2010, 09:32 AM
So nervous trying to figure out how to create plausible deniability in your latest fag-bashing post you screwed up the indefinite article for the apple, I see.

Or was it just more of your semi-literacy?

In either case: thanks for the morning laugh!

Talk about homophobe.

bjkeefe
07-03-2010, 09:42 AM
Talk about homophobe.

Yes, I was speaking of you. Thanks for admitting it, finally.

Whatfur
07-07-2010, 10:36 AM
Rationing Czar. (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/07/president-obama-to-make-recess-appointment-of-cms-administrator-republicans-attacking-as-expert-on-r.html)

Whatfur
07-07-2010, 03:32 PM
"President Obama said earlier this year that the health-care bill that Congress passed three months ago is "essentially identical" to the Massachusetts universal coverage plan that then-Gov. Mitt Romney signed into law in 2006. No one but Mr. Romney disagrees." (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704324304575306861120760580.html)

Whatfur
07-12-2010, 03:37 PM
One thing after another.... (http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-reform-implementation/108015-tax-report-rehashes-debate-over-cost-effectiveness-of-health-reform-law)

Whatfur
07-24-2010, 10:19 PM
Its for the kids! (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gZKdr0p7pV1QqsGrF20K-0-54GggD9H4UK8G0)

Whatfur
08-03-2010, 10:48 PM
Missouri voting Yes on NObamacare

Proposition C Precincts Reporting 1704 of 3354
Yes 395,693 75.8%
No 126,228 24.2%
Total Votes 521,921

Whatfur
09-01-2010, 03:35 PM
"Vote to Repeal" (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703369704575461840575037482.html?m od=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop)

handle
09-01-2010, 04:14 PM
"Vote to Repeal" (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703369704575461840575037482.html?m od=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop)

Jesus Thinks You're a Jerk (http://www.mp3lyrics.org/f/frank-zappa/jesus/)

Whatfur
09-14-2010, 02:27 PM
"We have to pass the bill, so can find out whats in it"--Nancy Pelosi

First wave of Obamacare repeals comes from? Yep the White House. (http://www.latimes.com/health/la-na-health-reform-change-20100914,0,5055513.story)

"Chickens coming home to roost"--Fred Ziffel

handle
09-14-2010, 03:06 PM
"We have to pass the bill, so can find out whats in it"--Nancy Pelosi

First wave of Obamacare repeals comes from? Yep the White House. (http://www.latimes.com/health/la-na-health-reform-change-20100914,0,5055513.story)

"Chickens coming home to roost"--Fred Ziffel

Funny... they didn't refer to it as "obamacare" nor did they call these proposals "repeals", nor did they speculate that it may be part of a "wave".
Your rhetoric is absurdly hyperbolic, misleading, and lays bare your devious intent to manipulate by bending connotations.

And while I'm on the subject, just so you know, your "Jesus' Name for this thread is ridiculous, just like so many others you have started... "monte lefto" (gag) springs to mind. This has got to be an embarrassment, even to members of your dainty little tea party (I can play the smeartext game if you can).



On Tuesday, the Senate is to take up two competing proposals to change the mandate as amendments to a small-business assistance bill, one by Florida Democrat Bill Nelson and one by Nebraska Republican Mike Johanns."

re·peal (r-pl)
tr.v. re·pealed, re·peal·ing, re·peals
1. To revoke or rescind, especially by an official or formal act.
2. Obsolete To summon back or recall, especially from exile.

a·mend·ment (-mndmnt)
n.
1. The act of changing for the better; improvement: "Society may sometimes show signs of repentance and amendment" (George G. Coulton).
2. A correction or alteration, as in a manuscript.
3.
a. The process of formally altering or adding to a document or record.
b. A statement of such an alteration or addition: The 19th Amendment to the Constitution gave women the right to vote.
4. A material, such as organic matter or sand, mixed into soil to improve growing conditions.

Ocean
09-14-2010, 03:16 PM
Your rhetoric is absurdly hyperbolic, misleading, and lays bare your devious intent to manipulate by bending connotations.


Handle, I'm going to borrow that sentence, and most especially the bolded part. I've been looking for the right wording for that and now I found it!

handle
09-14-2010, 03:32 PM
Handle, I'm going to borrow that sentence, and most especially the bolded part. I've been looking for the right wording for that and now I found it!

I would consider it a great honor, your Oceaness.
(I need a serious smiley so no one thinks I'm kidding, since I am such a snarky bastard.*)

*There's a quote for herr fur'er to use. Generous, aint I?

handle
09-14-2010, 03:49 PM
Couldn't help but notice, our friend just deleted this response to you:
F O O

Very economical syntax, I must say. But I am at a loss to interpret.
Perhaps he could indulge one of the posters he calls "not very bright" (translation: posters that don't buy what he is selling) and provide a decryption?

Whatfur
09-14-2010, 03:53 PM
Handle, I'm going to borrow that sentence, and most especially the bolded part. I've been looking for the right wording for that and now I found it!

Brilliant. Usually handle gets bored using just his own hands.

Ocean
09-14-2010, 04:00 PM
I would consider it a great honor, your Oceaness.
(I need a serious smiley so no one thinks I'm kidding, since I am such a snarky bastard.*)

*There's a quote for herr fur'er to use. Generous, aint I?

Don't listen to him, handle, he's jealous. And, yes, you were generous.

handle
09-14-2010, 04:00 PM
Brilliant. Usually handle gets bored using just his own hands.

C'mon fureak! You provide little challenge of late. One and done, too easy.

graz
09-14-2010, 04:11 PM
C'mon fureak! You provide little challenge of late. One and done, too easy.

Thanks, well I thought ignoring graz and handle might work but as you can see although I continue in that arena

He must have switched arenas again.

handle
09-14-2010, 04:13 PM
Don't listen to him, handle, he's jealous. And, yes, you were generous.

Thanks Ocean, but I am a snarky bastard, and damn proud of it. I can toast his marshmallows on self awareness alone.
You hit square on the mark with "jealous" don't read his response to you if you can avoid it. It seems he's already gone to his "special" place.
I probably should give him a time out so he can heal.... and help him stay out of what seems to be becoming his dungeon.

handle
09-14-2010, 04:56 PM
He must have switched arenas again.

I gotta be honest, I lost on that one, I had my money on a Thursday meltdown, and that came in on Wednesday, if memory serves.
My theory was that he kicked off the weekend earlier than usual last week. Judging from this dainty little tea party, it remains ongoing.

Whatfur
09-15-2010, 06:11 AM
Couldn't get it done. (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/news/ap/politics/2010/Sep/14/senate_fails_to_cut_tax_provision_in_health_law.ht ml)

handle
09-15-2010, 02:26 PM
Couldn't get it done. (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/news/ap/politics/2010/Sep/14/senate_fails_to_cut_tax_provision_in_health_law.ht ml)

For those with no time or tolerance for fureeeks link agenda, scroll down to the bottom of the "piece" and voila!:

"Congress still has time to act, since the reporting requirement will not take effect until 2012."

Try not to panic fureeek, aren't your heros about to take over anyway? Or are those predictions nothing more than partisan chest thumping?
Orrrr... are you just trying to bury the exchange just above this one, 'cause your hyperbolic foolishness was highlighted?

graz
09-15-2010, 03:50 PM
For those with no time or tolerance for fureeeks link agenda, scroll down to the bottom of the "piece" and voila!:

"Congress still has time to act, since the reporting requirement will not take effect until 2012."

Try not to panic fureeek, aren't your heros about to take over anyway? Or are those predictions nothing more than partisan chest thumping?
Orrrr... are you just trying to bury the exchange just above this one, 'cause your hyperbolic foolishness was highlighted?

Why do you persist in harassing fureeek by pointing out his hypocrisy and inconsistent standards?

He may have another meltdown, similar to last night's which was only different from the last dozen in his choice of victim.

I can tell that he took Jeff's advice and did look himself in the mirror, repeating the phrase:
I am not a troll ... I am not a troll ... I am not a troll.
I am a true believer, a tea partier, a chris christie, paul ryan conservative.
Hear me roar!

handle
09-15-2010, 04:23 PM
Why do you persist in harassing fureeek by pointing out his hypocrisy and inconsistent standards?

He may have another meltdown, similar to last night's which was only different from the last dozen in his choice of victim.

I can tell that he took Jeff's advice and did look himself in the mirror, repeating the phrase:
I am not a troll ... I am not a troll ... I am not a troll.
I am a true believer, a tea partier, a chris christie, paul ryan conservative.
Hear me roar!

A gift, to be sure. I enjoyed reading that last night and didn't see how adding anything could have made it any better. He would have predictably implied that we were having a homo-erotic encounter, like he always does anyway.
I am, however, going to have to start a thread for him on the difference between "hacking" and googling, and the difference between a ones page on a networking site and ones actual "website". Oh, and then there's the difference between "trolling" and responding. Concepts us "idiots" probably shouldn't have to help a genius like himself with, but I do try to help out whenever possible :)

Wait, I almost forgot the best part! His threats to start "harassing" posters, who "feed" "his" "trolls". Start? hope he meant retroactively.

Hey furrreeeek, maybe you should begin your "harassment" posts with some sort of declaration, so they can be differentiated from your usual delusional shtick.

graz
09-15-2010, 05:58 PM
I am, however, going to have to start a thread for him on the difference between "hacking" and googling, and the difference between a ones page on a networking site and ones actual "website". Oh, and then there's the difference between "trolling" and responding. Concepts us "idiots" probably shouldn't have to help a genius like himself with, but I do try to help out whenever possible :)


Damn, so I'm not really a hacker? I coulda been a contenda.