PDA

View Full Version : BHtv Spambusters New Ability


Whatfur
12-11-2009, 10:27 AM
So now Branflake has the ability to extract threads from within threads and re-post them anywhere he likes, complete with the removal of posts he deems removable.

When I first noticed in the Wright/Hitchens thread that a number of posts had been removed...I thought, "More BHtv Admin BS", with the caveat that at least they extracted it from the point Keefe hijacked it and turned what was suppose to be funny into his sick, flamed twists.

Now I see it reposted here by HIM??? complete with his initial retort causing the death spiral to me removed? How convenient.

Whatfur
12-11-2009, 10:32 AM
More obvious BHtv bias. First they let an entire thread bearing my moniker be created whose efforts included nothing but the rantings of two sometimes-posters spewing a steady stream of insults in my direction but now they allow one of their own Spambusters...who I thought were only here to remove porn and marketing posts...extract entire threads and repost them complete with his own editting.

...and so it goes.

nikkibong
12-11-2009, 10:35 AM
More obvious BHtv bias. First they let an entire thread bearing my moniker be created whose efforts included nothing but the rantings of two sometimes-posters spewing a steady stream of insults in my direction but now they allow one of their own Spambusters...who I thought were only here to remove porn and marketing posts...extract entire threads and repost them complete with his own editting.

...and so it goes.

i have no idea what you're talking about.

can you link please?

bjkeefe
12-11-2009, 10:43 AM
So now Branflake has the ability to extract threads from within threads and re-post them anywhere he likes ...

That's not true. If something got moved, it was by an admin.

Whatfur
12-11-2009, 10:44 AM
i have no idea what you're talking about.

can you link please?

See "Flame War cont." in this same area. It is cut out of the Hitchens thread...see my response to Conn in that thread. Keefe's immediate response to me there has been conveniently removed in the migration.

bjkeefe
12-11-2009, 10:54 AM
See "Flame War cont." in this same area. It is cut out of the Hitchens thread...see my response to Conn in that thread. Keefe's immediate response to me there has been conveniently removed in the migration.

See here (http://bloggingheads.tv/forum/showthread.php?p=142461#post142461).

Seriously, Whimpfur, is there nothing that will not cause you to lose your mind?

Brenda
12-11-2009, 11:02 AM
It was I who moved the posts from the diavlog thread to the Life Etc. forum. Since bjkeefe's was the first post in the batch, the thread appears with his name as the thread starter.

graz
12-11-2009, 11:04 AM
When I first noticed in the Wright/Hitchens thread that a number of posts had been removed...I thought, "More BHtv Admin BS", with the caveat that at least they extracted it from the point Keefe hijacked it and turned what was suppose to be funny into his sick, flamed twists.

A couple of things... Trusting in your sense of humor was your first mistake. As usually is the case the forum readers have to suffer the consequences.

And B - Just because your paranoid, doesn't mean there are forces aligned against you. But from that, shouldn't follow that whatever scenario you cook up has any plausibility, other than to the extent that it furthers your sense of victimization and self-regard.

Whatfur
12-11-2009, 11:08 AM
A couple of things... Trusting in your sense of humor was your first mistake. As usually is the case the forum readers have to suffer the consequences.

And B - Just because your paranoid, doesn't mean there are forces aligned against you. But from that, shouldn't follow that whatever scenario you cook up has any plausibility, other than to the extent that it furthers your sense of victimization and self-regard.

Who asked you...feel free to return to the underside of your rock...where you and handle can sit and wait or your next opportunity to slither out and take a shot. How about you forget about your obsession with me and the embarrassment I have caused you in the past and return to being a regular contributor here instead of a Fur Troll.

graz
12-11-2009, 11:12 AM
...the embarrassment I have caused...

Who asked you... The rules of engagement are clear.

...feel free... And so I shall.

Whatfur
12-11-2009, 11:19 AM
It was I who moved the posts from the diavlog thread to the Life Etc. forum. Since bjkeefe's was the first post in the batch, the thread appears with his name as the thread starter.

My congratulations on recognizing the point at which the Flamer turned it into a Flame.

How do you come to make such, seemingly ramdom, inconsistant, decisions on what deserves extraction?

graz
12-11-2009, 11:22 AM
It was I who moved the posts from the diavlog thread to the Life Etc. forum. Since bjkeefe's was the first post in the batch, the thread appears with his name as the thread starter.

Thanks Brenda. Your editorial swiftness is much appreciated. Keep up the good and likely thankless part of your bhtv efforts.

Whatfur
12-11-2009, 11:25 AM
The rules of engagement are clear.

And so I shall.

Fine...may I suggest a lighter rock...the one you currently utilize seems quite the burden.

graz
12-11-2009, 11:33 AM
Humor without the hurt. Not bad.
Is the hardcore stuff on hold till the whiskey-fire kicks in?
It's cocktail time somewhere in the world.

Whatfur
12-11-2009, 11:58 AM
Humor without the hurt. Not bad.
Is the hardcore stuff on hold till the whiskey-fire kicks in?
It's cocktail time somewhere in the world.

The old man moniker was not working so you all are going with the old drunk moniker. Classy.

bjkeefe
12-11-2009, 12:05 PM
[...] Classy.

The idea of 'fur criticizing anyone else for a lack of class sets a new record for lack of self-awareness.

osmium
12-11-2009, 12:08 PM
http://general.sc35.info/artlists/redpanda.jpg

Hey all you guys (gals). Here's a red panda. Isn't he a cutie?

Whatfur
12-11-2009, 12:10 PM
The idea of 'fur criticizing anyone else for a lack of class sets a new record for lack of self-awareness.

...says Mr. Projection.

Whatfur
12-11-2009, 12:11 PM
http://general.sc35.info/artlists/redpanda.jpg

Hey all you guys (gals). Here's a red panda. Isn't he a cutie?

So cute he should have a thread all its own. Brenda?

claymisher
12-11-2009, 12:13 PM
What percentage of whatfur's posts are about whatfur? 90% 95% What's the point? Why bother? It's depressing.

Francoamerican
12-11-2009, 12:16 PM
http://general.sc35.info/artlists/redpanda.jpg

Hey all you guys (gals). Here's a red panda. Isn't he a cutie?

A cute FUR-ry little critter. Do I detect an oblique allusion here?

Ocean
12-11-2009, 12:22 PM
Hey all you guys (gals). Here's a red panda. Isn't he a cutie?

It's adorable.

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:lXMKBsADREkaPM:http://myanimalblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/red-panda-in-tree.jpg

Are you feeling OK? :)

bjkeefe
12-11-2009, 12:29 PM
...says Mr. Projection.

Another record for lack of self-awareness. Not to mention repetition.

Face it, Whimpfer, your use of "projection" as an all-purpose response every time you get called out on some aspect of your objectionable behavior is nothing more than a fancy way of saying I know you are, but what am I? Your ability to insult remains stuck at the elementary school level.

You may be fooling yourself, and maybe one or two of your fellow wearers of the victim cloak, but you're not fooling anybody else.

Just so you know.

look
12-11-2009, 01:05 PM
Hey all you guys (gals). Here's a red panda. Isn't he a cutie?Not as cute as you.

handle
12-11-2009, 04:09 PM
My congratulations on recognizing the point at which the Flamer turned it into a Flame.

Yeah, just after you offered to physically engage four posters! You aren't losing your freak'n mind!

How do you come to make such, seemingly ramdom, inconsistant, decisions on what deserves extraction?

Is acting dense a common tactic of extreme right wing blowhards (http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-december-8-2009/gretchen-carlson-dumbs-down) or have you typecast yourself here?

Apologies to the Admins and others, but FYI, the day this kind, gentle and lovely human stops with the noise, I pledge to do the same.

Whatfur
12-11-2009, 04:20 PM
Be careful...Mr. Stones was banned for hijacking a thread...and his was not half as effective. ;)

handle
12-11-2009, 04:23 PM
Actually, I went back and read the post again, and I'm not real sure I get what he was even driving at:
Carroll v. Farley (or Alterman) might be a nice addition.

Then if they really wanted to bring them in... a UFC Cage match amongst all the commenters. Of course the same 4 to 1 ratio there as it is here would probably still be fair.

In all fairness, maybe he's "kidding"?
But it wouldn't be the first time he's alluded to inter-commenter fisticuffs.. and not in a very jovial way, I might add.

osmium
12-11-2009, 04:42 PM
Be careful...Mr. Stones was banned for hijacking a thread...and his was not half as effective. ;)

It is possible to threadjack for the forces of good!

AemJeff
12-11-2009, 04:47 PM
It is possible to threadjack for the forces of good!

Like this, right?

http://www.beloblog.com/KHOU_Animal_Attraction/toby.jpg

Whatfur
12-11-2009, 05:22 PM
I guess you are right. When do we get to meet the rest of your family?


http://bestqualitywallpapers.com/Games/Incredibles.jpg

Simon Willard
12-14-2009, 11:12 AM
Thanks Brenda. Your editorial swiftness is much appreciated. Keep up the good and likely thankless part of your bhtv efforts.

Good work Brenda. Bob, give her a raise.

Whatfur
12-14-2009, 11:56 AM
Good work Brenda. Bob, give her a raise.

I would agree Simon except for the fact that the good work is not issued enough and generally with bias.

graz
12-14-2009, 12:24 PM
I would agree Simon except for the fact that the good work is not issued enough and generally with bias.

So actually, you disagree and have continued your efforts to undermine her authority... without any proof... just your word... Ha!